From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS54825 147.75.192.0/21 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from ny.mirrors.kernel.org (ny.mirrors.kernel.org [147.75.199.223]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D61A21F44D for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 21:33:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=sasl header.b=j8htNnuv; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ny.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A4B21C66BE1 for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 21:33:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B688F13D88F; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 21:33:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="j8htNnuv" Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (pb-smtp21.pobox.com [173.228.157.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E57AA13D63A for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 21:33:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=173.228.157.53 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711488809; cv=none; b=YH+YyIl8qPGYpAUo+TEvriWcHJ/oonA5EeHDYIlmz9T3iDL3RpKwdyJbqVzQgw+yX87sFx7h4BfLFevptz42/GlBd/JfVMxDYyou3lUBiV4DYgQ7YsVtIfY4QvGSbQBKkOxfl2PCHJYs/Qcu25MjQtIaNSfDU9L59GtcFcOMMHM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711488809; c=relaxed/simple; bh=yaSHvtE/Tduvv4ZMeSJwgeNy0tY7pJ/OkVdC4iUNqhs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=O4jTva9kom+k8mmBQcU6uCLRpd7fbXLSqoXABBzQydQd2aF/0FnNrnVmfhZkybtck2VlTHx0u468kwEvClwmor/54Tt7X0flAdkgNjh6pOWLH6PKeAD98KM8KnSoDQV1Yg6yy+U7Pz2d8oFUYHs9Q1RN+9Be1/48UVrN04d5FIk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=j8htNnuv; arc=none smtp.client-ip=173.228.157.53 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5993030218; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 17:33:21 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=yaSHvtE/Tduvv4ZMeSJwgeNy0tY7pJ/OkVdC4i UNqhs=; b=j8htNnuvCKfUAy25J/h+LDXzTR1jd/1heT+o8R7LHeJxLixHKdjd28 JOR1BYMmIj9YxB3YWVfJWal5J2Y8VzYv6moi4DE7kL1uOsP4Fo5wJZ7po77XH2nm hkhFfE1HA0Whcq8MoOn3wTZa5gaiPv2g3LI1zaFvXqsRVvoqZg+jQ= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5282C30217; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 17:33:21 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.125.139.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D94F630216; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 17:33:17 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Josh Steadmon Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, johannes.schindelin@gmx.de, peff@peff.net, phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] test-tool: add unit test suite runner In-Reply-To: (Josh Steadmon's message of "Fri, 23 Feb 2024 15:33:49 -0800") References: Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 14:33:16 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 75DDD61E-EBB8-11EE-B35F-A19503B9AAD1-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Josh Steadmon writes: > Please note: this series has once again been rebased onto the latest > jk/unit-tests-buildfix. > > For various reasons (see discussion at [1]) we would like an alternative > to `prove` for running test suites (including the unit tests) on > Windows. Folks, what's the status of this one? I just checked the RFC thread and this last one (more than a month ago) and the issues seems to have been addressed, but I prefer positive acks rather than "we've seen it already, take our silence as the sign of endorsement". Thanks.