From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] bundle: don't leak an fd in case of early return Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 10:19:09 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1459298333-21899-1-git-send-email-sbeller@google.com> <1459298333-21899-6-git-send-email-sbeller@google.com> <20160330011743.GD2237@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Stefan Beller , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Mar 30 19:19:24 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1alJm3-0007JH-WC for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 19:19:20 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755224AbcC3RTN (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:19:13 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp0.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:62481 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753575AbcC3RTM (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:19:12 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp0.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EEB84FE4E; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:19:11 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=4tFxrHd8SbOjnckNX0ZrKzUKYRs=; b=Ygq9T8 8a6k7aGVuzxjcXMMP9PQ3Tbbw0WihY7oklZdRWn1G28rDPlkEo9A4U+b0KNPA7EU 0VQJWcd3NkcdjK0/98cxivUmyNLmhOUi19Zm4uRlws4hozHPuRgXA13i1Bzfnen+ u+5SGRtqpi/DtIq00Tr5SvlLVFtgg7ZaWtl8E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=kSEgx4dvsvH4hwfjjticZ9cZ5e0tnb1G IGLuKpBNxtnqYNeeBam2WFIMuOqACuO74HDBaUozaIDK2i9nb6FODnyxjBcnZcPC EKs7mNLiRjBL9FFWNSwvF53cRzvmZAOksDA5XFJu7tpXf6Yd4ejAkfor8PSzO2a3 +ToI1Bqa4Xo= Received: from pb-smtp0.int.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp0.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55AED4FE4D; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:19:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.1.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp0.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BD94F4FE4B; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:19:10 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20160330011743.GD2237@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Tue, 29 Mar 2016 21:17:43 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 847E8FBC-F69B-11E5-A025-45AF6BB36C07-77302942!pb-smtp0.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King writes: >> + if (compute_and_write_prerequisites(bundle_fd, &revs, argc, argv)) { >> + if (!bundle_to_stdout) >> + close(bundle_fd); >> return -1; >> + } > > Makes sense. Should we also be rolling back the lock file? It happens > automatically at program exit, of course, but we are in library code > here that should not rely on that. Yeah, I agree. I suspect that the original wasn't even meant to be used in a "library-ish" fashion, but as long as we are adding this close(), we should also be doing the rollback. Thanks.