From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36D2D1FE4E for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 19:29:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751358AbcGLT3s (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2016 15:29:48 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:53392 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751193AbcGLT3s (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2016 15:29:48 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C73872A807; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 15:29:46 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=ITFG2AwRmn5tHD6xECpGiR5Cstk=; b=jKthwk /bbxM8s41K58GF/lJnVXRzcV5FjaL+uMsJd0CHgWH4eNzKw+bYTcKemxMDZ2Ebld 8DQ8aCXokZkcrpQevej6FIyHgNiWX5/HrbAcLxBhlpZKt6d2Ji0MS/0IZuUWySzo p7iDYulvH6kZj+7oZWqOnpWvqU0jUkixp90sA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=K8tJj+tKtq8aB62mbkYq3KZtFp2CSLBn CSpNgH6iSJD4CZ0MgjFtGXYvtVxxvWycS8vL06wqoKny7aeTWLgdiAms7QvrmR3z zawVlLtHsV6tiPQDVpo7nwK+bsK8qnyzqS6AnsNDuUE8Er0tsQocQfBkQ1Y/pMbG bWp+Fn17Vrs= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFABE2A806; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 15:29:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 46CD12A805; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 15:29:46 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Philip Oakley Cc: GitList , Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Name for A..B ranges? References: <20160630202509.4472-1-philipoakley@iee.org> <20160711202518.532-1-philipoakley@iee.org> Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 12:29:44 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20160711202518.532-1-philipoakley@iee.org> (Philip Oakley's message of "Mon, 11 Jul 2016 21:25:10 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: FDC85F3E-4866-11E6-99B8-89D312518317-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Philip Oakley writes: > This is the re-roll of the po/range-doc (2016-07-01) 3 commits and its > follow on patch. > > The series has gained additional patches following the discussions > ($gmane/298790). > > The original first 3 patches are unchanged, though 2/8 has been inserted > to name the Left and Right ranges. > > The extra four patches carefully tease out the clarification of > reachability. Reachability is defined relative the ancestry chain thus > (hopefully) avoiding misunderstandings. > > The final patch updates the summary examples, and the tricky (for the > untutored reader) two dots case of a linear development where r1..r2 > excludes r1 itself. > > The patches can be squashed together if required. Looked mostly sensible, except for a few things mentioned in the reviews by Marc (to which I mostly agree with). Thanks.