From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 695A41F4F8 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 17:44:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932260AbcJKRo1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Oct 2016 13:44:27 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:59024 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932254AbcJKRms (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Oct 2016 13:42:48 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23D4741407; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 13:42:22 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=0fq/eOJntnNjbFaxTMh5NdXiaMg=; b=ttbzI+ cWaZr1J8W+veBz9LbcfEjJEZopndy4waPw4fTqILlBH1uv2Q+iSrObRos1OC4ubj bbkDTfrHmCup2uPuoo9n92Y3KYx25hxE9pQ3XatfM1/swIWK9UYj6QiFh31/vp90 sf3nJU+EtQjydDwoP7jcRwZ6X+ugW7mJi44Qc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=hWCeUvRiNQLgn5CAudQS0ZVtIvlrm0eo G3QLsOyTpWR5z5iB+JOYF4o2iZvkU3/WDlr+YIfSSmtqslGKMizQu1wwSjaTPj8/ jzLAPXntRhZ7ZHuS0h8eO72C3VF50KxHmnMyK1eDD1JwZSRyBEyktmHVURrqTTGG z38cQlp7bI8= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C74641405; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 13:42:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7CD7341401; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 13:42:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Brandon Williams Cc: Stefan Beller , git@vger.kernel.org, pclouds@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/28] attr: (re)introduce git_check_attr() and struct git_attr_check References: <20161011002115.23312-1-sbeller@google.com> <20161011002115.23312-12-sbeller@google.com> <20161011165936.GA9085@google.com> Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 10:42:19 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20161011165936.GA9085@google.com> (Brandon Williams's message of "Tue, 11 Oct 2016 09:59:36 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 0FFC8C92-8FDA-11E6-8FFB-5F377B1B28F4-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Brandon Williams writes: > On 10/10, Stefan Beller wrote: >> From: Junio C Hamano >> >> A common pattern to check N attributes for many paths is to >> >> (1) prepare an array A of N git_attr_check_elem items; >> (2) call git_attr() to intern the N attribute names and fill A; > > Does the word 'intern' here mean internalize? It took me a few reads to > stop picturing college students running around an office :) The verb comes from Lisp world where you "intern" a string to make a symbol.