From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 568B01F5FB for ; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 18:58:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752560AbdCBS6G (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Mar 2017 13:58:06 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:60044 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751461AbdCBS6F (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Mar 2017 13:58:05 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3BAE8372A; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 13:03:32 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=6G9HgdiBLUkx44+Tujeh03GSbns=; b=dDfS56 Tu5THuP8GKiJwF2zLUhWJHPbbeQGPc0rrqoFi23rmfs0SrOg8ObtllaUFW7TZwDZ Z2x11lmKQVQJs+goHwmRyxbQPSbIteFScDxWy7oYuUDwCs44eA/0AATguYzT3G/l NfNmuZ1b0kF/T+cc9rosl+U9nk6p1yA5krGmo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=gHTacNul2cSd/kENr/UClVZYOvYOKssO ebqw/fKmEokd94HvFwc4JoKdVPMqHFk0TewW6FeCjSAzTyzBoeqRyMzkJrgMFyhz V9X7KbRBSg8ZqXm5+IZ9vTCdsYVIm+rvpVTOhyM76D0+bvij3Af+BsQF7UeH8Ox8 8LDQ1ZjvvzM= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE8883729; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 13:03:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5C13C83728; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 13:03:32 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Lars Schneider Cc: Johannes Schindelin , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Travis: also test on 32-bit Linux References: <20170302105157.59791-1-larsxschneider@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 10:03:31 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Lars Schneider's message of "Thu, 2 Mar 2017 12:38:47 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 8C23A2EE-FF72-11E6-BE69-97B1B46B9B0B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Lars Schneider writes: >> On 02 Mar 2017, at 12:24, Johannes Schindelin wrote: >> >> Hi Lars, >> >> On Thu, 2 Mar 2017, Lars Schneider wrote: >> >>> The patch looks good to me in general but I want to propose the following >>> changes: >> >> I know you are using your script to generate this mail, but I would have >> liked to see v2 in the subject ;-) > > Yeah, sorry. I already had a "D'oh" moment *after* I saw the email in > my email client. Now I am wondering... is the next version v2 or v3 :D Another question is which v3 people mean in the discussion, when you and Dscho work on improvements at the same time and each post the "next" version marked as "v3", and they comment on one of them? Between "v2" and "v3", it would not make too much difference to the readership, when it is clear that two people are working to produce competing improvements without much coordination (i.e. lack of "ok, I'll send a reroll marked as vX in a minite"--"ok, I'll wait and comment on it" exchange). People watching from the sideline know "ah this is v3 from Lars which is the highest numbered one from him on this topic". As long as you do not mark your next one "v1", you'd be OK ;-).