From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72A9F1FA26 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:14:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754196AbdDRAOZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Apr 2017 20:14:25 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:61875 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751634AbdDRAOY (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Apr 2017 20:14:24 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A05B73CD3; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 20:14:23 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=4aLiv3I9Q8ZD8pdZFKxc6N/e1lQ=; b=roZP03 ale7iVXEFwaWLVp+zUiBvoX1VJx4DqW4YdVfXUfMGN4Z0nWChS3BjiymIpVL+eyn nNaf3+oDeIpksC0/ZisgnueVRsVmkuH+m+ykFxlUx1vdLRru/2tIhX4X0Z7vck+P r6m/7K5izpI2auUOaFBjCXpg3akKTQHFBckpA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=DW3EoMpdvtoMFB7b6b+5mS/jrZiHc+3+ H7848hghFT9sgK1s2Dz7pLFanGdmF/mvWagnDtKSEUmvsZyZi5glbNESnvkn0Y+M ahn3hujocE/GdReEVAQbI9FHWqBU+pq7cAAfH6kOMqXC5vur1cYoOTr1OnhAwya6 IGa5ixHd1fU= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01EEE73CD2; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 20:14:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 701A673CD1; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 20:14:22 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Giuseppe Bilotta Cc: Git ML Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] rebase --signoff References: <20170415144103.11986-1-giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 17:14:21 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Giuseppe Bilotta's message of "Mon, 17 Apr 2017 16:12:19 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: F939CAAC-23CB-11E7-BF14-C260AE2156B6-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Giuseppe Bilotta writes: >> - How does this interact with "git rebase -i" and other modes of >> operation? > > A better question would maybe be how do we want this to interact? If "git rebase -i/-m --signoff" will not do anything (which I suspect is what we have here), we at least would want it to be documented, or the combination be made to error out, I would think. A better question can wait until that happens ;-)