From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA26E201C8 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 03:56:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751516AbdKMD4R (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Nov 2017 22:56:17 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:59656 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751243AbdKMD4Q (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Nov 2017 22:56:16 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC08598002; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 22:56:15 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=XpccrWjEfO97zt6DSKhyz95TSXk=; b=GWK4A9 kX0MhJb/vcpECUeL1RCNcZQcQHZy3XTqgXdXDdmhuHz3UEBemDQuYJpO1pkb2PL5 +f5G3OUrFnpsM95QsQ9lnJBRUm3zQ0Roh5q6SeyGpcjTLpe4Em1YlzEN/MEAioCb xhKKGSIl+fK43rxrIWprf2DXITHfce4ejLFRU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=UT+pp2XBVRrjznSgNXtKGktV6DjH3OEs jziPrx5WGE29tGFoDb0Uqm5OcMlnJdP7HsvXoOIe+dXytTHJHjXiFl6dCv3yFjRi Rx3RDwyc2ePiG6LJXoZCauCtA1B8RC7m7ws40ZwImALDCOzqdiezwOnFAiZcxnm2 fHqw0ZJDdrI= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3E3F98001; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 22:56:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6912D97000; Sun, 12 Nov 2017 22:56:15 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Stephan Beyer Cc: Pranit Bauva , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 Part II 5/8] bisect--helper: `bisect_next_check` shell function in C References: <0102015f5e5ee171-f30f4868-886f-47a1-a4e4-b4936afc545d-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com> <0102015f5e5ee2ca-bf824205-86e6-4259-b7d7-a68e2fbb087d-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com> <214cfc63-79a8-a46f-4440-5e223186f2ff@gmx.net> Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 12:56:14 +0900 In-Reply-To: <214cfc63-79a8-a46f-4440-5e223186f2ff@gmx.net> (Stephan Beyer's message of "Sun, 12 Nov 2017 21:03:45 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 98B5C8DE-C826-11E7-A491-575F0C78B957-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Stephan Beyer writes: > Hi again ;) > ... > In both of the above "error" calls, you should drop the final "\n" > because "error" does that already. > > On the other hand, you have dropped the "\n"s of the orginal error > messages. So it should probably be > > _("You need to give me at least one %s and %s revision.\n" > "You can use \"git bisect %s\" and \"git bisect %s\" for that.") > > and > > _("You need to start by \"git bisect start\".\n" > "You then need to give me at least one %s and %s revision.\n" > "You can use \"git bisect %s\" and "\"git bisect %s\" for that.") > > Stephan Thanks for reviews (not just this patch, but for reviews on other patches, too).