From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: orgads@gmail.com
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Rebase: Run post-checkout hook on checkout
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2018 14:53:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqimzdl0v4.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181224212425.16596-3-orgads@gmail.com> (orgads's message of "Mon, 24 Dec 2018 23:24:25 +0200")
orgads@gmail.com writes:
> From: Orgad Shaneh <orgads@gmail.com>
> Re: [PATCH 2/2] Rebase: Run post-checkout hook on checkout
There is no explanation here?
Is this a regression fix (i.e. scripted version of "rebase" used to
run the hook)? Or a new feature (i.e. no earlier version of
"rebase" run the hook but you think it ought to run it)?
> Signed-off-by: Orgad Shaneh <orgads@gmail.com>
> ---
> builtin/rebase.c | 11 +++++++++--
> t/t5403-post-checkout-hook.sh | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/builtin/rebase.c b/builtin/rebase.c
> index b5c99ec10c..7f7a2c738e 100644
> --- a/builtin/rebase.c
> +++ b/builtin/rebase.c
> @@ -530,6 +530,7 @@ static int run_specific_rebase(struct rebase_options *opts)
>
> #define RESET_HEAD_DETACH (1<<0)
> #define RESET_HEAD_HARD (1<<1)
> +#define RESET_HEAD_RUN_HOOK (1<<2)
Would it be plausible that the only possible hook that can be run by
reset_head() function will always be post-checkout and nothing else,
I wonder? Shouldn't this bit be called *_RUN_POST_CHECKOUT to make
sure it is specific enough?
> @@ -537,6 +538,7 @@ static int reset_head(struct object_id *oid, const char *action,
> {
> unsigned detach_head = flags & RESET_HEAD_DETACH;
> unsigned reset_hard = flags & RESET_HEAD_HARD;
> + unsigned run_hook = flags & RESET_HEAD_RUN_HOOK;
> struct object_id head_oid;
> struct tree_desc desc[2] = { { NULL }, { NULL } };
> struct lock_file lock = LOCK_INIT;
> @@ -636,6 +638,10 @@ static int reset_head(struct object_id *oid, const char *action,
> ret = update_ref(reflog_head, "HEAD", oid, NULL, 0,
> UPDATE_REFS_MSG_ON_ERR);
> }
> + if (run_hook)
> + run_hook_le(NULL, "post-checkout",
> + oid_to_hex(orig ? orig : &null_oid),
> + oid_to_hex(oid), "1", NULL);
>
This function is never about checking out paths from tree-ish/index
and is always about checking out a branch, so hardcoded "1" is
justified here. Good.
> @@ -1465,7 +1471,8 @@ int cmd_rebase(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
> getenv(GIT_REFLOG_ACTION_ENVIRONMENT),
> options.switch_to);
> if (reset_head(&oid, "checkout",
> - options.head_name, 0,
> + options.head_name,
> + RESET_HEAD_RUN_HOOK,
> NULL, buf.buf) < 0) {
> ret = !!error(_("could not switch to "
> "%s"),
> @@ -1539,7 +1546,7 @@ int cmd_rebase(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
> strbuf_addf(&msg, "%s: checkout %s",
> getenv(GIT_REFLOG_ACTION_ENVIRONMENT), options.onto_name);
> if (reset_head(&options.onto->object.oid, "checkout", NULL,
> - RESET_HEAD_DETACH, NULL, msg.buf))
> + RESET_HEAD_DETACH | RESET_HEAD_RUN_HOOK, NULL, msg.buf))
> die(_("Could not detach HEAD"));
> strbuf_release(&msg);
So... among 6 callers of reset_head(), these two whose *action is
"checkout" gets the RUN_HOOK bit. Makes sense.
> diff --git a/t/t5403-post-checkout-hook.sh b/t/t5403-post-checkout-hook.sh
> index 9f9a5163c5..5b4e582caa 100755
> --- a/t/t5403-post-checkout-hook.sh
> +++ b/t/t5403-post-checkout-hook.sh
> @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ test_expect_success setup '
> EOF
> test_commit one &&
> test_commit two &&
> + test_commit rebase-on-me &&
> + git reset --hard HEAD^ &&
> test_commit three three
> '
>
> @@ -51,6 +53,24 @@ test_expect_success 'post-checkout receives the right args when not switching br
> rm -f .git/post-checkout.args
> '
>
> +test_expect_success 'post-checkout is triggered on rebase' '
> + git checkout -b rebase-test master &&
> + rm -f .git/post-checkout.args &&
Read the title of this whole test script file; it should verify what
is in the file before removing it.
> + git rebase rebase-on-me &&
> + read old new flag < .git/post-checkout.args &&
No SP between "<" and ".git/post-checkout.args".
> + test $old != $new && test $flag = 1 &&
> + rm -f .git/post-checkout.args
> +'
Regarding the clean-up of this file, see my review on the previous
one.
> +test_expect_success 'post-checkout is triggered on rebase with fast-forward' '
The same comment as above applies to this.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-28 22:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-24 21:24 [PATCH] Rebase: Run post-checkout hook on checkout orgads
2018-12-24 21:24 ` [PATCH 1/2] t5403: Refactor orgads
2018-12-28 22:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-12-29 3:06 ` Ramsay Jones
2018-12-29 21:36 ` Orgad Shaneh
2018-12-24 21:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] Rebase: Run post-checkout hook on checkout orgads
2018-12-28 22:53 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2018-12-29 21:31 ` Orgad Shaneh
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-12-29 21:37 [PATCH 1/2] t5403: simplify by using a single repository orgads
2018-12-29 21:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] Rebase: Run post-checkout hook on checkout orgads
2019-01-02 15:47 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-12-20 21:55 [PATCH 1/2] t5403: Refactor orgads
2018-12-20 21:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] Rebase: Run post-checkout hook on checkout orgads
2018-12-20 21:48 [PATCH 1/2] t5403: Refactor orgads
2018-12-20 21:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] Rebase: Run post-checkout hook on checkout orgads
2018-12-21 16:12 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-12-24 21:24 ` Orgad Shaneh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqimzdl0v4.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=orgads@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).