From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9002820248 for ; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 08:21:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726580AbfDIIVN (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Apr 2019 04:21:13 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f65.google.com ([209.85.221.65]:33451 "EHLO mail-wr1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726062AbfDIIVN (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Apr 2019 04:21:13 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f65.google.com with SMTP id q1so19673676wrp.0 for ; Tue, 09 Apr 2019 01:21:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=g4dG38XqRrZH91mGxdV/xXvlOeopcq4eb5uxe7pslYI=; b=qT5OX9yMsv5ZAJXehJjqztqtFGyD5lOA/+k/7duZupRMl+8yP/ZVKohQV44337imUx yy/PVrVEAk+m8IKLTICigC7GrR5vTm73lzC4UMUnkQy6w1zuatka7DUMTfiFhmcn9V8c P7tVWSy80NKc/NR5UHzEGSbRMLzKP0eVjR1WpyDfUkI11xJV/bfVg9SasHmXTpCblFcg UHC5XKg6Ex0RV9nivsdSs4eFRGdapYNLMYcuOn318WrJOMDhIkNOmAMdixHnk3S24rYN HyEULdghru/XrVNd26EhbShO11oocoCcvvLnuvC93XmCMxv4zZnZOEw6WXB2HF2LsOM2 R+Ig== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=g4dG38XqRrZH91mGxdV/xXvlOeopcq4eb5uxe7pslYI=; b=gGlUI8OgbP2Orh+fTHiqmjfLw6MTnvvyl0TPgZFg8xvgLAaIlJZvAyCTfPz8eHj6TF 6FDYWoSJZG6XJBPXHe4f6bG3QBVVBs/MdzdNSr5Zp9J5AOcu99Esz5hGQPFrxotJMU1T QeidwoHU5DTGlPFK071r6ObTbr0KHJNc8jESeWwzYdj0mNfpW1d21OVrhVPhwgxGWnh6 1FAugr6jcpxBALopbc/xSXLue9RIvjjJxdTM6KTjW90oCLaJvGE8U2HclDogUmy4wDCb U+V6vgzgOdYBnQ/OsMyN6sYAtF98ekQpVlh/OufEs1qP1faCWaz/CEDtDMn+dD3hOgj/ O7vQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWx+z49y6z2wYdmSoEeRoYtq+jz8g/F9sv5AtEpIo9l433zyma+ 2zr0oEqS23h2eyxRuFyPD0w= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxpPkH+DJ87Wb/B63g1hHcTHbPm594CW816/Oi2It7xC5cpiYVTp8DBEE7XS4SLibAOvx8dww== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1286:: with SMTP id f6mr16335941wrx.93.1554798071032; Tue, 09 Apr 2019 01:21:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (141.255.76.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.76.255.141]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a23sm10681607wmm.46.2019.04.09.01.21.10 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 09 Apr 2019 01:21:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason Cc: Jeff King , git@vger.kernel.org, Derrick Stolee , Christian Couder Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sha1-file: test the error behavior of alt_odb_usable() References: <20181204132716.19208-2-avarab@gmail.com> <20190328200456.29240-1-avarab@gmail.com> <20190329134603.GB21802@sigill.intra.peff.net> <87pnq9aipl.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> <874l78a3rz.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2019 17:21:10 +0900 In-Reply-To: <874l78a3rz.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> (=?utf-8?B?IsOGdmFyIEFy?= =?utf-8?B?bmZqw7Zyw7A=?= Bjarmason"'s message of "Mon, 08 Apr 2019 17:57:20 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes: >> Yup. Just wanted to get the patch to test what we do *currently* out, >> might loop back to finishing up the rest of this. > > Junio: *ping* about picking up this trivial test coverage improvement I was waiting for you to make up your mind about your earlier "might loop back to finishing up". For a topic like this, for which the ball has been in your court for a long time, just resending would be easier to handle than pinging, as I do not remember much about the original attempt anyway ;-)