git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: "Johannes Schindelin" <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
	"Taylor Blau" <me@ttaylorr.com>,
	"Đoàn Trần Công Danh" <congdanhqx@gmail.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org, "Jeff Hostetler" <jeffhost@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] CI: limit GitHub Actions to designated branches
Date: Thu, 07 May 2020 11:17:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqimh74njl.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200507140208.GA3060463@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Thu, 7 May 2020 10:02:08 -0400")

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:

> On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 08:17:27AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
>
>> > But doesn't this (i.e. uses: actions/github-script) still pay the
>> > cost of spinning up a VM?  How expensive is it to check out a small
>> > tree with a single file, whether it is ref-whitelist or allow-ref?
>> 
>> I suspect this script mechanism may be much cheaper. I don't know the
>> implementation details, but spinning up a nodejs container to run a
>> javascript snippet should be much cheaper than a full ubuntu VM running
>> "git clone" (the clone itself should be super cheap because it's a
>> shallow single-branch clone of a tree with one file in it, but getting
>> there is relatively heavy-weight).
>
> Sorry, this is all complete nonsense. There is no magical nodejs
> container in Actions. You still have to say "runs-on: ubuntu-latest". So
> it's still spinning up that VM and then running inside there.

Ah, I did see "runs-on: ubuntu-latest" in the tutorial for the node
thing, and was very much dissapointed, before I sent that "don't you
still spin up a VM anyway?" response.  Glad to know that I wasn't
totally misreading the documentation, and unhappy that there wasn't
a magic bullet after all X-<.

> and they took 1, 2, and 3 seconds respectively. They spend 2s getting
> the environment set up and the actions loaded. So the API one spent less
> than 1s on the network, but the single-file checkout spent slightly
> more. Given the timing variations I've seen, I wouldn't be surprised if
> it sometimes goes the other way. But even if those numbers are accurate,
> I don't think the cost difference is enough to force our hand either
> way.

Yup, the above tempts me to say "because we are spinning a VM
anyway, why not just run an end-user supplied script and let it
decide?" would be the best approach.

Unless somebody finds a magic bullet, that is, but unfortunately the
nodejs one does not seem to be one.

Thanks.


  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-07 18:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-02 15:08 [PATCH] ci: respect the [skip ci] convention in our GitHub workflow "CI/PR" Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2020-05-03  9:36 ` Jeff King
2020-05-03 12:05   ` Danh Doan
2020-05-04 15:01     ` Jeff King
2020-05-04 15:49       ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Limit GitHub Actions to designated branches Đoàn Trần Công Danh
2020-05-04 15:49         ` [PATCH v2 1/2] CI: limit " Đoàn Trần Công Danh
2020-05-04 16:23           ` Jeff King
2020-05-04 21:58             ` Taylor Blau
2020-05-04 22:52               ` Junio C Hamano
2020-05-04 23:15                 ` Taylor Blau
2020-05-04 23:35                   ` Jeff King
2020-05-05  0:24                     ` Junio C Hamano
2020-05-04 23:36               ` Jeff King
2020-05-05  0:20                 ` Taylor Blau
2020-05-05 16:43                   ` Jeff King
2020-05-05 17:57                     ` Junio C Hamano
2020-05-05 18:24                       ` Jeff King
2020-05-05 21:04                         ` Jeff King
2020-05-05 21:29                           ` Junio C Hamano
2020-05-05 21:58                             ` Jeff King
2020-05-05 22:28                               ` Junio C Hamano
2020-05-06 15:09                             ` Johannes Schindelin
2020-05-06 16:26                               ` Junio C Hamano
2020-05-07 12:17                                 ` Jeff King
2020-05-07 14:02                                   ` Jeff King
2020-05-07 18:17                                     ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2020-05-07 12:01                               ` Đoàn Trần Công Danh
2020-05-07 12:47                                 ` Đoàn Trần Công Danh
2020-05-06  0:46                           ` Đoàn Trần Công Danh
2020-05-06  3:56                             ` Junio C Hamano
2020-05-06 14:25                               ` Đoàn Trần Công Danh
2020-05-06 16:31                                 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-05-07 12:25                                   ` Jeff King
2020-05-07 18:29                                     ` Junio C Hamano
2020-05-07 18:54                                       ` Jeff King
2020-05-07 19:33                                         ` Junio C Hamano
2020-05-07 16:20                           ` [PATCH v2] ci: allow per-branch config for GitHub Actions Jeff King
2020-05-07 17:00                             ` Taylor Blau
2020-05-07 17:18                               ` Jeff King
2020-05-07 19:53                             ` Junio C Hamano
2020-05-07 20:46                               ` Jeff King
2020-05-07 21:58                                 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-05-08 18:00                                   ` Jeff King
2020-05-09  1:23                                     ` Đoàn Trần Công Danh
2020-05-05  0:34             ` [PATCH v2 1/2] CI: limit GitHub Actions to designated branches Đoàn Trần Công Danh
2020-05-04 15:49         ` [PATCH v2 2/2] SubmittingPatches: advertise GitHub Actions CI Đoàn Trần Công Danh
2020-05-04 16:37           ` Junio C Hamano
2020-05-05  0:46             ` Đoàn Trần Công Danh
2020-05-05 16:26         ` [PATCH v3 0/3] Provide option to opt in/out GitHub Actions Đoàn Trần Công Danh
2020-05-05 16:26           ` [PATCH v3 1/3] SubmittingPatches: advertise GitHub Actions CI Đoàn Trần Công Danh
2020-05-05 16:47             ` Jeff King
2020-05-05 16:59               ` Đoàn Trần Công Danh
2020-05-05 17:07                 ` Jeff King
2020-05-05 16:26           ` [PATCH v3 2/3] CI: limit GitHub Actions to designated branches Đoàn Trần Công Danh
2020-05-05 16:51             ` Jeff King
2020-05-05 17:05               ` Đoàn Trần Công Danh
2020-05-05 17:11                 ` Jeff King
2020-05-05 18:49             ` Junio C Hamano
2020-05-05 16:26           ` [PATCH v3 3/3] fixup! " Đoàn Trần Công Danh
2020-05-05 18:59             ` Junio C Hamano
2020-05-05 17:01           ` [PATCH v3 0/3] Provide option to opt in/out GitHub Actions Jeff King
2020-05-03 16:46   ` [PATCH] ci: respect the [skip ci] convention in our GitHub workflow "CI/PR" Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqimh74njl.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=congdanhqx@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jeffhost@microsoft.com \
    --cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).