From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28F971F9E5 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 16:58:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236043AbhGUQRM (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jul 2021 12:17:12 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:60809 "EHLO pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229561AbhGUQRM (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jul 2021 12:17:12 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 746B11459B9; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 12:57:48 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=zPv/Ncs4BdRqObabMUaGFPF9v/10gTGUZ0G70G MNvZM=; b=J4fWacgJOyKWy5vHasq2QP/jgVpJ9/DJdtBEIQ/cPto0zyWGqNmOGo brH/Zgf10u2G78I1FgdoGGiFhY/I+YUlgHdlBe3ap2TuzyPgWjsyc9gYiGknSgwK PEbz73g2COXRVi2UX7KwzAnRTFtBdAp3W2CrTSRnopny7E0xEI2T8= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CD911459B8; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 12:57:48 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.3.135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B3C1B1459B7; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 12:57:45 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Philip Oakley Cc: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] bundle doc: elaborate on rev<->ref restriction References: <68ea4cc0-b9d3-a7fb-7c22-fa828f9dc52f@iee.email> Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 09:57:44 -0700 In-Reply-To: <68ea4cc0-b9d3-a7fb-7c22-fa828f9dc52f@iee.email> (Philip Oakley's message of "Wed, 21 Jul 2021 10:27:40 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: C5867BEE-EA44-11EB-9D5F-FA9E2DDBB1FC-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Philip Oakley writes: > Should the `list-heads` option be mentioned for investigating existing > bundles? I think 'list-heads' has been listed in the options section. I however may encourage people to use "git ls-remote one.bndl" over "git bundle list-heads one.bndl"---they do the same thing, no? Thanks.