From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E02B1F54E for ; Sat, 23 Jul 2022 17:47:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="KzCbHfqJ"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237240AbiGWRr1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Jul 2022 13:47:27 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52762 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230005AbiGWRrY (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Jul 2022 13:47:24 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (pb-smtp1.pobox.com [64.147.108.70]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB437193F1 for ; Sat, 23 Jul 2022 10:47:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04BAA145754; Sat, 23 Jul 2022 13:47:23 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=aSuRsXqHPiEXHTRLRsI0IoPAdSQuYZ7laGYTJI 1P8rA=; b=KzCbHfqJg+u3e6YoUL7f8vGERklorFYcVyq4Cgm6UK9XLbjq8Tanyh vCVGV+9fr1lOpdYLbifkRnNdJf4gPD7lz4DSecINIJqF6LAHBDo/OO+C826iK4Ky wHeq3pG/dwnilqANRZFKNPDyUtocOKgZHKRqv9oppidWlYA6laqe8= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEA51145753; Sat, 23 Jul 2022 13:47:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.105.40.190]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 532CB145752; Sat, 23 Jul 2022 13:47:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: "tenglong.tl" Cc: avarab@gmail.com, git@jeffhostetler.com, git@vger.kernel.org, tenglong.tl@alibaba-inc.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] api-trace2.txt: print config key-value pair References: <20220723060619.24566-1-tenglong.tl@alibaba-inc.com> Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2022 10:47:21 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20220723060619.24566-1-tenglong.tl@alibaba-inc.com> (tenglong tl's message of "Sat, 23 Jul 2022 14:06:19 +0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 8152F5F6-0AAF-11ED-9B4E-5E84C8D8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org "tenglong.tl" writes: >> Isn't this a bit premature to do in [PATCH 1/2]? > > Yes, one oversight, sorry for that and will fix. I've tweaked with "rebase -i" after queuing and before pushing the integration result out, so if you can double check the result to make sure I didn't screw up, there is no need to resend. Thanks.