From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E0FC1F47C for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2023 00:02:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=HmlSrwKl; dkim-atps=neutral Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229553AbjAVACR (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jan 2023 19:02:17 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34146 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229463AbjAVACQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jan 2023 19:02:16 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-x52b.google.com (mail-pg1-x52b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D31223663 for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2023 16:02:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pg1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id b12so6641580pgj.6 for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2023 16:02:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=vxzpsBkbNLULM5c5TJDd+Xo05j71A/Pf4H1AOHPqxgI=; b=HmlSrwKlHtEAZ9m6fw/Yow7SxsK/kAWENEz1AJiJWnMPM55EsRtnknyO/XWohjPpw/ btHsA+vBd43wxMbFySJCI0yjMB+i0qKDwiGT82jA+15xVhu2rLjeYEX4dHhCyWEMpjjm +pm1CNWkJI1T12aj+rqPIM9NDxiqVj6VdjV7QFrtChA9cKKbegHCPCN1H4cIdWHg3/ft Okp9RI9d6c1W/+OZEFDsDMo4PR+bZquJgmdupPUPucoRBrk+ElT9wmjSlCv6PoUZY5pv udj4dtoHpcekxEh6eIF5t3IuRfiCRixI4jyHQweV1UTcA5z2MN5qJEDjQygKlbg9usyy Yucw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=vxzpsBkbNLULM5c5TJDd+Xo05j71A/Pf4H1AOHPqxgI=; b=gHMoaCuiJY4lNfkq8ChslOFDmBogEjqxKXChr8UveEfXXQ8GmeI6N7jSUQlBuPKPim yL+3C46jAY2SLVXOxL6CPalwepiACMwzQI8LRABuNcm2fxKS1kEVKnRg7OJQMT7nEcGH FYVDHuAwNjYX8jboX9BI0lQdtdoBguKXYEhaZhnDjzCzi1pp4ZnXBQJcuOqRBbLTTkS0 R4Sp3SlPguP7alvRSJyprMecbGOhh3Akd2Mvq04LjK5i9frZ2X5DMqYmjPfldlFPiTL0 zCh5hFaWMCHPyOh09q8OvKevJvp6I7EUbmkXWKUXd4E5aN5K7vWu907HG+13MmYL0FrS xUJA== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2krCt18eLot/Gw/by2dZo84lK6j4nhH8WSddkvbcE9lbh845HeFt BefRJKQAojhFwcAH9raVrG+HD5m9Fmw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXs8Xn67PuFM3plZ07nqwMAh2Y9Iv16jHyYuL4DSz9kP/lLJk1NqxQ9TIqlFO41iLCBcmJy5nw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:4519:b0:58d:f047:53b7 with SMTP id cw25-20020a056a00451900b0058df04753b7mr13865046pfb.3.1674345734838; Sat, 21 Jan 2023 16:02:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (33.5.83.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.83.5.33]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o189-20020a62cdc6000000b0058baa6586f3sm17304566pfg.135.2023.01.21.16.02.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 21 Jan 2023 16:02:14 -0800 (PST) Sender: Junio C Hamano From: Junio C Hamano To: Elijah Newren Cc: Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, Derrick Stolee Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] rebase: remove completely useless -C option References: Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2023 16:02:14 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Elijah Newren's message of "Fri, 20 Jan 2023 20:52:05 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Elijah Newren writes: > I'd probably go for that, but since in my mind the plan is still to > deprecate and remove the apply backend as you suggested at [1], I'm > not particularly motivated to improve/extend options specific to the > apply backend of rebase. I still consider that deprecating and removing the "am|format-patch pipeline" mode is a good longer term goal, but it seems we still have some features that are only available with the mode and not the other "sequence of cherry-pick" mode? We'd need to port that over to the other backend before we can wean ourselves off of the apply backend. Until then, ...