From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 690C31F47D for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2023 19:28:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=mVQkOSz2; dkim-atps=neutral Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229680AbjCHT2B (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Mar 2023 14:28:01 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48162 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229468AbjCHT17 (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Mar 2023 14:27:59 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x62e.google.com (mail-pl1-x62e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70DF2212B for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2023 11:27:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id x11so14161568pln.12 for ; Wed, 08 Mar 2023 11:27:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1678303674; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=RzcASvaiZq/lM6gLLdJTNryQ2ty1opHbEKOGlp2kZ8U=; b=mVQkOSz2F5uydF1dcTjAl+eDit6Y2YE7W6+SF0jKUzIhhRKssB9AV3uhW75lp2OTeI u+7e+DCjCuP4/yafKuhUvst5dw3FVWMnMgNTQE2lYuC2PoXn1knmTbE4ahjjieqCVUKz lpzB9UWPk0dNgRKcW/HcJZ4gDqr5QsG7udmAGrIBPfKSxhxSE1FfN4btwzC5YGjXrpyD GoA8TFUttiM4L8qjNGk9XfI+hMJeFmJgaZv6VhsbVZ4IE2dhT/8RVLp85a9NPaI3XFCY +PwmkZIfXrCH/8f2T1871xsIAJkQDmIeJSrmwDRAKJz8JynPDtEU04C6v7zGkLaOL9z4 PzjA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1678303674; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=RzcASvaiZq/lM6gLLdJTNryQ2ty1opHbEKOGlp2kZ8U=; b=UZuYzBvIIhZgrCPLSPh8FBYUPwpwSuJvdSIZlFPyffs069+MdWX/OjR9dcqkzRA2qH b9ncHxb2lyYJzIsmxxwaLLeW4VDFTmHIY/37bbi218LWkMYR4/Pm6jrWYUvtQnWkcuub 1Dyoudhq/odSwYCurfgvMa4wXrNZgDKsMa9viik9A5NzEnQFRrZ4FZlFX+NZrbCmXpXu nbpQYS7wuQOrnYN1InM0BynMyU1gbxFlI+OnY/32Z5ygkkuBnVqufyuORUX1l1YSZGKo 0/9FBWZY0q6i/SD+CjANXhBheXNnv/wzGrcJAmGHZiw1VTdgFtEJC3hy5az3tGjQH2oW x2FQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKWByEITqKrZuNPbOTfuKXf2zySOft5eG/evTdlDbgf0WioN7BcS 0F1jn8i+4qip0DxLD7hgzjI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set8wqPi/moqxZjJ2k7U55+dXTIKDb68DXxOGZKRrr7szXdDruhlhV2fwlh9+F32kd6Pc/TNJoQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:2290:b0:19a:c65d:f90 with SMTP id b16-20020a170903229000b0019ac65d0f90mr24242297plh.44.1678303673845; Wed, 08 Mar 2023 11:27:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (83.92.168.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.168.92.83]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ks16-20020a170903085000b0019a8530c063sm10114840plb.102.2023.03.08.11.27.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 08 Mar 2023 11:27:53 -0800 (PST) Sender: Junio C Hamano From: Junio C Hamano To: "William Sprent via GitGitGadget" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Victoria Dye , Elijah Newren , William Sprent Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] builtin/sparse-checkout: remove NEED_WORK_TREE flag References: <4b231e9beb43e4fac6457b9bf86e4c1db39c4238.1678283349.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2023 11:27:53 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Wed, 08 Mar 2023 10:14:04 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano writes: > But you did not find a place the feature you wanted to add with > [2/2] would fit better, perhaps, in which case, somebody else may be > able to suggest an alternative in their reviews of that step, > hopefully. ... oh, or perhaps the list would reach a consensus that mixing a subcommand that does not require a working tree is not all that bad, which I am personally OK with, too. I didn't at all mean to say: "this shouldn't be a subcommand there, do it somewhere else". Thanks.