git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Siddharth Kannan <kannan.siddharth12@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr,
	pranit.bauva@gmail.com, peff@peff.net, pclouds@gmail.com,
	sandals@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v3] revision.c: args starting with "-" might be a revision
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 15:35:47 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqh941ippo.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1486752926-12020-2-git-send-email-kannan.siddharth12@gmail.com> (Siddharth Kannan's message of "Fri, 10 Feb 2017 18:55:25 +0000")

Siddharth Kannan <kannan.siddharth12@gmail.com> writes:

> @@ -2234,11 +2235,18 @@ int setup_revisions(int argc, const char **argv, struct rev_info *revs, struct s
>  			}
>  			if (opts < 0)
>  				exit(128);
> -			continue;
> +
> +			args = handle_revision_arg(arg, revs, flags, revarg_opt);
> +			handle_rev_arg_called = 1;
> +			if (args)
> +				continue;
> +			else
> +				--left;
>  		}
>  
>  
> -		if (handle_revision_arg(arg, revs, flags, revarg_opt)) {
> +		if ((handle_rev_arg_called && args) ||
> +				handle_revision_arg(arg, revs, flags, revarg_opt)) {

Naively I would have expected that removing the "continue" at the
end and letting the control go to the existing

	if (handle_revision_arg(arg, revs, flags, revarg_opt)) {

would be all that is needed.  The latter half of the patch is an
artifact of having ane xtra "handle_revision_arg() calls inside the
"if it begins with dash" block to avoid calling it twice.

So the difference is just "--left" (by the way, our codebase seem to
prefer "left--" when there is no difference between pre- or post-
decrement/increment) that adjusts the slot in argv[] where the next
unknown argument is stuffed to.

The adjustment is needed as the call to handle_revision_opt() that
is before the pre-context of this hunk stuffed the unknown thing
that begins with "-" into argv[left++]; if that thing turns out to
be a valid rev, then you would need to take it back, because after
all, that is not an unknown command line argument.

I am wondering if writing it like the following is easier to
understand.  I had a hard time figuring out what you are trying to
do, partly because "args" is quite a misnomer---implying "how many
arguments did we see" that is similar to opts that does mean "how
many options did handle_revision_opts() see?"  The variable means
means "yes we saw a valid rev" when it is zero.  The rewrite
below may avoid such a confusion.  I dunno.

 revision.c | 14 +++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/revision.c b/revision.c
index b37dbec378..e238430948 100644
--- a/revision.c
+++ b/revision.c
@@ -2204,6 +2204,7 @@ int setup_revisions(int argc, const char **argv, struct rev_info *revs, struct s
 		revarg_opt |= REVARG_CANNOT_BE_FILENAME;
 	read_from_stdin = 0;
 	for (left = i = 1; i < argc; i++) {
+		int maybe_rev = 0;
 		const char *arg = argv[i];
 		if (*arg == '-') {
 			int opts;
@@ -2234,11 +2235,16 @@ int setup_revisions(int argc, const char **argv, struct rev_info *revs, struct s
 			}
 			if (opts < 0)
 				exit(128);
-			continue;
+			maybe_rev = 1;
+			left--; /* tentatively cancel "unknown opt" */
 		}
 
-
-		if (handle_revision_arg(arg, revs, flags, revarg_opt)) {
+		if (!handle_revision_arg(arg, revs, flags, revarg_opt)) {
+			got_rev_arg = 1;
+		} else if (maybe_rev) {
+			left++; /* it turns out that it was "unknown opt" */
+			continue;
+		} else {
 			int j;
 			if (seen_dashdash || *arg == '^')
 				die("bad revision '%s'", arg);
@@ -2255,8 +2261,6 @@ int setup_revisions(int argc, const char **argv, struct rev_info *revs, struct s
 			append_prune_data(&prune_data, argv + i);
 			break;
 		}
-		else
-			got_rev_arg = 1;
 	}
 
 	if (prune_data.nr) {

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-02-10 23:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-10 18:55 [PATCH 0/2 v3] WIP: allow "-" as a shorthand for "previous branch" Siddharth Kannan
2017-02-10 18:55 ` [PATCH 1/2 v3] revision.c: args starting with "-" might be a revision Siddharth Kannan
2017-02-10 18:55   ` [PATCH 2/2 v3] sha1_name: teach get_sha1_1 "-" shorthand for "@{-1}" Siddharth Kannan
2017-02-12  9:48     ` Matthieu Moy
2017-02-12 10:42       ` Siddharth Kannan
2017-02-13 19:51       ` Junio C Hamano
2017-02-13 20:03         ` Junio C Hamano
2017-02-10 23:35   ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2017-02-11  7:52     ` [PATCH 1/2 v3] revision.c: args starting with "-" might be a revision Siddharth Kannan
2017-02-11 21:08       ` Junio C Hamano
2017-02-11 23:40         ` Junio C Hamano
2017-02-12 18:41           ` [PATCH 0/3] prepare for a rev/range that begins with a dash Junio C Hamano
2017-02-12 18:41             ` [PATCH 1/3] handle_revision_opt(): do not update argv[left++] with an unknown arg Junio C Hamano
2017-02-12 18:41             ` [PATCH 2/3] setup_revisions(): swap if/else bodies to make the next step more readable Junio C Hamano
2017-02-12 18:41             ` [PATCH 3/3] setup_revisions(): allow a rev that begins with a dash Junio C Hamano
2017-02-12 12:36         ` [PATCH 1/2 v3] revision.c: args starting with "-" might be a revision Siddharth Kannan
2017-02-12 18:56           ` Junio C Hamano
2017-02-14  4:23             ` Siddharth Kannan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqh941ippo.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kannan.siddharth12@gmail.com \
    --cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=pranit.bauva@gmail.com \
    --cc=sandals@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).