From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A327D202A5 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 01:33:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751554AbdIUBdx (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Sep 2017 21:33:53 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:54874 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751000AbdIUBdw (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Sep 2017 21:33:52 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3B75A6811; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 21:33:52 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=dGwBk1VVfz9Q13a9hmwo3J0aisw=; b=JDGkfM /deOLvBlE/WPXBSOEb1bTI0LnBi5oD8SKN7oLAwDvVJz/Huj04JSwo7v1iXMNbMK xBRZ8cbv6KWJLjj4opr20xstlAEe7G720o8KxytWDHd5rsUrADQz9WEByuEcz1Hu NFrJXD9zhpNboI0tAW8vuOpzLil1FdPq9ce1o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=RPol1zNx+6ITy5SDo9+Ptol0xeow7A9S Ykw6PYsbBQ6zmMTLwtIjABSa3GNTCj2wPCHBpxDKNFf/YIONuEBKo5+YBIz4kkgB UD61iZ4dWSQWN8eHq9Jg07axfyKwMI7WwtQcF+PiI1gQ7jjzJEaZ5eQ5llvKl7tx ABWJIcS/efY= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB02EA6810; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 21:33:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 076ABA680F; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 21:33:51 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Kaartic Sivaraam Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] branch: document the usage of certain parameters References: <20170919071525.9404-1-kaarticsivaraam91196@gmail.com> <20170919071525.9404-3-kaarticsivaraam91196@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 10:33:50 +0900 In-Reply-To: (Kaartic Sivaraam's message of "Wed, 20 Sep 2017 14:31:58 +0530") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: EC8D6B9E-9E6C-11E7-9919-9D2B0D78B957-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Kaartic Sivaraam writes: > Can I do this or should I keep the patch focused around the > documentation part alone? You can do both if you wanted to but not in a same patch that makes the result noisier than it needs to.