From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2E901F406 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 17:08:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751625AbdLSRIr (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:08:47 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:57648 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751107AbdLSRIq (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:08:46 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06776D1992; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:08:46 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=YyA52pYQYhf1+el2OhzuKpY0cco=; b=tOStic ATWq235FTjvcYe16M3Ma+BdCf78KghV1VDNg0pUMCNZXVMWbTUyvqFaG+1a9i1ec tSUlWzCGMKY9Bz89Z7tNAc/6Mw20BO6KI1xnwtKU5w77vaGye1WUtVZSK0wHt6mm lnspOdAWfywGdaIqAlt57XviRucZLYCHkJuD4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=kkpxYQFMoWifpowc6EUqr+YOkLKh/MPV V5DmN9M9PxhQrBeByXJ72BNziZ1TOJI4HdnNIKotgz27ZyXFszKLN/by/5PrRM0b pfgEEN25Mn0TLAYtNvhcxz3MznoYNBNeEKc6fV9wZJMCCX0JnRYB83IrtTNJE87b mCLu1Py1MhQ= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1D76D1991; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:08:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 706A9D1990; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:08:45 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: Jakub Zaverka , "git\@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: difftool uses hardcoded perl shebang References: <20171219162528.GA5804@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20171219164532.GA6745@sigill.intra.peff.net> Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 09:08:44 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20171219164532.GA6745@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Tue, 19 Dec 2017 11:45:32 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 459B9BBC-E4DF-11E7-AAB9-575F0C78B957-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: > In the meantime, pointing to the actual build-time perl is a workaround > (but obviously not if it's being done by a third-party packager who has > no idea where your perl is). Is such a binary packaging scheme actually in use that deliberately leaves it up to the end user where/if a perl is installed and if it is an appropriately recent version? It sounds rather irresponsible to me.