From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_DKIM_INVALID, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 257A51F404 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 21:52:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751618AbeCPVwO (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Mar 2018 17:52:14 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-f196.google.com ([209.85.128.196]:33483 "EHLO mail-wr0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751233AbeCPVwN (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Mar 2018 17:52:13 -0400 Received: by mail-wr0-f196.google.com with SMTP id z73so8717369wrb.0 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 14:52:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=30FAc5e3ERXd9AdHLLr9AhC6SH2xIKRn1lb2spKfKVg=; b=NvYI/X4bx7dIVlRssyYsMEb/gPHa12xTlzHckitBFGjCq5P9QIdovXHjx2UlQDgGKP 465x+CBw4kQx8kaAewFpedfsaWkyavhIilXXnAirbwI2wNk8CO/0Dl4zbTRmhyVbOIFD iKraP0HXZWHL8pIuwdbA/zwVzgSmMcQUY066xlF5WfN1HRnnOtHiovlAiWjYKsNAz9RJ yiIDdfKNWz4ANnxCBK0ME4KPGLAd9hY3QNmQ0VsUZO50tzyAK2r9z4JdtpqanQgpdXqe 8uoIZuVGraiM10VGOZr5X2IfqJtK6wt2GsssgBJT2Ab68wcG62TEOdp/b28Bakv4yLqs Dp6Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=30FAc5e3ERXd9AdHLLr9AhC6SH2xIKRn1lb2spKfKVg=; b=sdQE6o9AWqU9ivgOxPP4TqOFAfGrAVv6a8jRgcHpwqgUajUS1ERU50zlOgLQz/YZzx bxj+0j0hRB+YipTezjo8m6paPdhgQhvC2dvz+mNbQz2YDMIjFhpKqwCuUUQMm8oMA/1a Y2QB6o0x6M+QbLyEYChuMMEMWQIRlJMD7VyQRVvcmiwjDYiDwKknIqMSzFRpR+I+7bEz irl75Qgp5c6ApboX0pwccICt6yIFguV+a2kpvmyn2SMyjHVgw3YoUVw4PXZhXti9PDYi HiMTkWVjfna5dHrCkhVmjQSD1WZJht/DKDekzOmry1moUveNk3k9hkqMof3GWQF2lGMW SMvA== X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7FH4DqSHjLennXQ7Ijnw9Sxvzh2UfHlR1ofuKHh6Qf9zf2JD8+r 9a1uKLwsszhDvLcZgv1mj2U= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELvfHIFkdW8mbBmTIIKkZey2y8lOPDchkJxajXnu4ngARRMQQLfk7/bd9b5cO/uAzRtCiwJ5RQ== X-Received: by 10.223.132.167 with SMTP id 36mr3080023wrg.227.1521237131501; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 14:52:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (168.50.187.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.187.50.168]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y111sm8932024wrc.0.2018.03.16.14.52.10 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 16 Mar 2018 14:52:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jonathan Tan Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Mar 2018, #03; Wed, 14) References: <20180316143124.5b22d70861344cbcbbad46dd@google.com> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 14:52:10 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20180316143124.5b22d70861344cbcbbad46dd@google.com> (Jonathan Tan's message of "Fri, 16 Mar 2018 14:31:24 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jonathan Tan writes: > On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 18:34:49 -0700 > Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> * sb/object-store (2018-03-05) 27 commits > > [snip list of commits] > >> (this branch is used by sb/packfiles-in-repository; uses nd/remove-ignore-env-field.) >> >> Refactoring the internal global data structure to make it possible >> to open multiple repositories, work with and then close them. >> >> Rerolled by Duy on top of a separate preliminary clean-up topic. >> The resulting structure of the topics looked very sensible. >> >> Waiting for a follow-up discussion. > > Would it be possible for this set to go in independently of > nd/remove-ignore-env-field? I understand that some patches might be > cleaner if ignore_env is first removed, but this patch set has already > undergone several rounds of review and (I think) is an improvement to > the codebase on its own. I thought the "remove-ignore-env-field" thing is a quite small and more-or-less straightforward improvements that would serve as a good preparatory change to give a solid foundation to the object-store topic. I was hoping to hear quick Acks for remove-ignore-env (and also Duy's reroll of their topics on it) from people involved in all the related topics, so that we can advance them more-or-less at the same time.