git@vger.kernel.org list mirror (unofficial, one of many)
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "René Scharfe" <l.s.r@web.de>
Cc: "Étienne SERVAIS" <etienne.servais@voucoux.fr>,
	git@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael Ascensão" <rafa.almas@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Simplify-by-decoration with decorate-refs-exclude
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 14:20:31 -0700
Message-ID: <xmqqh86zjmcg.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5de287e9-a8e8-780a-7d39-2229b61914ca@web.de> (=?utf-8?Q?=22R?= =?utf-8?Q?en=C3=A9?= Scharfe"'s message of "Fri, 2 Aug 2019 22:36:33 +0200")

René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> writes:

> Having cmd_log_init_finish() call load_ref_decorations() before
> setup_revisions() would indeed solve the issue as well.  But we need
> to call the latter to check if --pretty=raw was given and avoid loading
> decorations in that case, don't we?

I was thinking about giving an instance of the decoration_filter to
either rev_info or setup_revision_opt, and moving the call to
load_ref_decorations() and the decision to make that call from
cmd_log_init_finish() to setup_revisions().

>> Other two callers of load_ref_decorations() are deep inside pretty.c
>> but I wonder in the longer term if we would want to turn them into
>> an "a lot higher level should have already loaded decorations"
>> assert.
>
> This would require that higher level to parse the user format to check
> if %d or %D is present before formatting the first item.  Hmm.

Yes.  Don't we pre-scan what kind of formatting primitives are used
in the end-user supplied string already to optimize loading of notes
and source information?


  reply index

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-02  8:47 Étienne SERVAIS
2019-08-02 16:52 ` René Scharfe
2019-08-02 19:14   ` Junio C Hamano
2019-08-02 20:36     ` René Scharfe
2019-08-02 21:20       ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2019-08-02 23:21         ` Jeff King
2019-08-03  6:51         ` René Scharfe
2019-08-03 14:44           ` Junio C Hamano
2019-09-08 17:58             ` [PATCH 1/2] log: test --decorate-refs-exclude with --simplify-by-decoration René Scharfe
2019-09-09 18:17               ` Junio C Hamano
2019-09-08 17:58             ` [PATCH 2/2] log-tree: call load_ref_decorations() in get_name_decoration() René Scharfe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqh86zjmcg.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=etienne.servais@voucoux.fr \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=l.s.r@web.de \
    --cc=rafa.almas@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

git@vger.kernel.org list mirror (unofficial, one of many)

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://public-inbox.org/git
	git clone --mirror http://ou63pmih66umazou.onion/git
	git clone --mirror http://czquwvybam4bgbro.onion/git
	git clone --mirror http://hjrcffqmbrq6wope.onion/git

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroups are available over NNTP:
	nntp://news.public-inbox.org/inbox.comp.version-control.git
	nntp://ou63pmih66umazou.onion/inbox.comp.version-control.git
	nntp://czquwvybam4bgbro.onion/inbox.comp.version-control.git
	nntp://hjrcffqmbrq6wope.onion/inbox.comp.version-control.git
	nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.version-control.git

 note: .onion URLs require Tor: https://www.torproject.org/

AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git