From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27EA61F463 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 17:43:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388106AbfIPRnc (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Sep 2019 13:43:32 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:50379 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726957AbfIPRnc (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Sep 2019 13:43:32 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19265262F3; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 13:43:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=eejo8gPEOdbhsdBWneABxSJi4JE=; b=D0IOX8 SwscGqjbEsNvVt6SXVL+/XDUWkoxYjddnX8tb1HSRrYUIgOPkgKgBzysa1IuKZ8G 9ThtCNBCIkKl8K7V3YMiaTMcfIHNc3KJ1OvgROZaiJmzBB9/PpoDj9/FAsTgXShM NORME2bughFvLkYB4HVj81hvOhUbz2GB6c1RI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=Mq/WKBDciyH0/YqVxCGYgju1q/lw8Ezg 1IlfvC0gHPvhFWu2CHQHquh7anO1O2PWo0BWpUfExVxNcgsDna45+ErDzLMW4lHo KIXEjMGtKYrgaI1KbM+bmp78rQm3DS4XQ71Tf5CO8tBITQhjjd7BeFCtHzpbnb5D bB6ATyaVDa4= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FBB3262F2; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 13:43:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.76.80.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 522BD262F1; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 13:43:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Palmer Dabbelt Cc: Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de, git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: pd/fetch-jobs, was Re: What's cooking in git.git (Sep 2019, #01; Sat, 7) References: Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 10:43:28 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Palmer Dabbelt's message of "Sat, 14 Sep 2019 06:58:37 -0700 (PDT)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 7E6AF34C-D8A9-11E9-A78C-D1361DBA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Palmer Dabbelt writes: > ... It looks > like there are some test failures when I rebase to the latest master, > which I'm happy to fix. Just let me know if I should: > * Send just the first 4 patches, holding onto the last one for later. > ... > * Send just a single patch, which wouldn't add the --fetch-jobs and > --submodule-fetch-jobs arguments. It is either one of these two, I would say. I am personally much more comfotable with the usual "backward incompatibility migration" form (i.e. the former), but apparently I am nto the only person on the list so ... ;-)