From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EC151F45E for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 21:33:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726882AbgBRVdU (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Feb 2020 16:33:20 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:51242 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726339AbgBRVdU (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Feb 2020 16:33:20 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 024D2402C2; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 16:33:19 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=SeiGwQlSbGz/+ktfVPJBYRZuZl8=; b=YC0rtl 3lv6yh888eIPEBF9AGgNXO4gPEmDNDgDQ36ewRpeLAxtg8rc9nBEAOjh+sfxI3QW KZlSyuMhCh+edPYoAYQuVw2Qo9BxfE8xoDDvY6yp9z6TKRA6Ww4CO7tZ8JRSdDIn 2VvSi/i7zxjgDU5+vyS07Cnp/PtdxXO27yPoA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=LCofB90Da7Aq0QgFKEbLtCMtMHqeBD56 Wx31uWS84q5eTRQZUjmWWy9dwB3Hw/ULLh/hVYH6MY2R/NIdj4BcZaArNYclvVC4 aNKG4Un74z6Be79vbJakuXi+brBZPCMxm5ARbmFYjuxH+wpN90x7QQ2y8M+887Oh ZJ8aOuPXrdk= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEB91402C1; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 16:33:18 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.76.80.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5C4B7402C0; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 16:33:18 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: "Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Elijah Newren Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] t3424: new rebase testcase documenting a stat-dirty-like failure References: Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 13:33:17 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget's message of "Tue, 18 Feb 2020 20:55:31 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 475AC8AC-5296-11EA-ACDE-C28CBED8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org "Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget" writes: > t/t3424-rebase-across-mode-change.sh | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ t3424 is already taken by en/rebase-backend topic that has been cooking for some time by now. It seems 342? are all taken and the next available may be t3433 perhaps (please double check with 'pu')?