From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 357591F619 for ; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 21:33:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726777AbgCSVds (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Mar 2020 17:33:48 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com ([173.228.157.52]:65474 "EHLO pb-smtp20.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726619AbgCSVds (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Mar 2020 17:33:48 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 467E8B0D9E; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 17:33:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=Y0kZZGtxBDUVU19vH/7bHTJfcrQ=; b=r2nvps u4ORoot+J1WY/Gac/+3B48NToGx46yowhhLmjvN3rbGTsoONlU2/bNXFIr/U59mL jpBSeCwHyoo00wIP/CH2wx5jae8Drsm+OG1tiUEB+ts97FJ9uWpVOgASAl/xg1y1 eRY7tP0Qb675/mH4ZXP23wkGEYF5vRmGCWSXg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=Ajwyegy9yUGQvaI6jsozWiaRufgqwDRx W+Wd/K+VWBZtleJ25BA9xcTmfnUSYE6hlwE6LuMgdCdqEnKSlTFsIXH224qF+bqr eBDzGojephbEchLvC+4rCGiMQvW8U4LLZQpOoc9WRx3Qc0F+iKw5H1ILN5oEMKZh HemhVH3P6s0= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ECB0B0D9D; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 17:33:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8B169B0D9B; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 17:33:43 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Shourya Shukla Cc: chriscool@tuxfamily.org, git@vger.kernel.org, jnareb@gmail.com, johannes.schindelin@gmx.de, newren@gmail.com, peff@peff.net Subject: Re: RFC][Feature] submodule References: <20200319171626.5723-1-shouryashukla.oo@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 14:33:41 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20200319171626.5723-1-shouryashukla.oo@gmail.com> (Shourya Shukla's message of "Thu, 19 Mar 2020 22:46:26 +0530") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 4EC38FA2-6A29-11EA-BFF4-B0405B776F7B-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Shourya Shukla writes: > Also, what do you think may become a problem for large projects in > here? Perhaps "We want submodule A and B's sub(sub)*modules all the way down to the leaf submodule, but directory C houses many submodules, among which only one can be active, and we want C/X and its sub(sub)*modules all the way down to the leaf but not C/Y nor C/Z or any other C/." and similar requests along the line.