From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E7B21FF9C for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 18:33:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1789890AbgJZSdv (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Oct 2020 14:33:51 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:65060 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1784970AbgJZSdv (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Oct 2020 14:33:51 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFE3F90B1B; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 14:33:48 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=0ayJwBliB2toAhco51Ak17PHJAg=; b=XcKrBC GlHppW/voEVAHlyjJsRCgVchh0MC7HEIDOzGP+ePSNA70+1YzGDuGzkFze7rBI9R FwMFPDJ4pMJqNs438q7Fe+BdV+hlCDXQQs6I8xHnYYMTxzjmDEBwBJkSop2mnbfa edug8n5mj45FWCPRty1II64WsuKG/jPxu2pjs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=RGpAVohnAfTF3m9Kbsp+tcOkCOWQ/nyV cyFMabQCVLHHi1Dyn2QcGJ/n6VVx5elouNBt8Omar1CcNZe7O2fbWQm6WuMmAsi1 5xq0ctkWgOh4DAI/glAMZLMmUGvRuJAOx42/CTvAkdLGO+fFrnJ888xBXAsXqCGk hRJOVVlrB0s= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B788990B1A; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 14:33:48 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 479A190B19; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 14:33:48 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Tan , Jeff King , Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Work around flakiness in t5500.43 References: Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:33:47 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget's message of "Mon, 26 Oct 2020 16:09:13 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: C9919F38-17B9-11EB-9F38-74DE23BA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" writes: > It seems that this test became flaky only recently, although I have to admit > that I have no idea why: the involved code does not seem to have changed > recently at all. It should have been fixed by > https://lore.kernel.org/git/20200506220741.71021-1-jonathantanmy@google.com/ > , but apparently wasn't completely fixed, despite what I said in that > thread. > > Changes since v2: > > * Dropped patch 3/3 because it was only intended to be defensive > programming, but turned out to be too hard without layering violations. Thanks, the remaining two look identical, so let me preserve the timestamps by just dropping the tip one from what is queued, instead of queuing these two patches.