From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F5121F4B4 for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 02:32:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726335AbhAWC2U (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jan 2021 21:28:20 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:57175 "EHLO pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726013AbhAWC2T (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jan 2021 21:28:19 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81FCB113F47; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 21:27:35 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=Ori/jwwKTxfw+EJCml9i4/H2Fo0=; b=pWAH5n nH9O1gkdN/IoSooyeZ7w5/JOmLF7Zy5hMtGlR/5JxiUcOHxTUePbKeXk9vBlHVSt eSje1UhU6uF38lrlb7Cb4LYWyKyrPVB8/Nf+IrYnr42g1/Y9zdE+oxd8jObIHOpO 4+57LWYfgWw4/VOy5bqaOR62cNd8AN5ddT/5s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=rWchJODTHO81UGJ8iS9cbCjlwUCAUkzS KY99rUdCvLy/VUyATmmYxjtxVyFQ4mTkC/6hhhx2L9Azn3OXYOkSDHYVp9LcC4aA aq57vTTz5uAM4T8/SjVkWjlKK0fiaI7DuAwAfheloZ+/EhVK1xAEeXw8gOvAqSv/ zxJ/0pWwtCw= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79EDB113F46; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 21:27:35 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.196.36.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C3909113F45; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 21:27:32 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Martin von Zweigbergk Cc: Christian Couder , "Patricia B. C." , git Subject: Re: Can git change? References: Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 18:27:30 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Martin von Zweigbergk's message of "Fri, 22 Jan 2021 12:43:53 -1000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 8C3F460E-5D22-11EB-83E4-D609E328BF65-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Martin von Zweigbergk writes: > This is probably quite off topic for the thread, but I'm curious why > you think it was a bad idea to have octopus merges in git.git's > history (there seem to be 37 of them). Octoupi in our history, at least the older ones, solve no real life problem; it only gives us "now we have something cool-looking that other people's version control systems never had", which is of dubious value. And their presense makes bisection less efficient than it could be around them, which is a real downside.