git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Cc: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] pack-redundant: escalate deprecation warning to an error
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 14:23:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqh6ub6u1p.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZBzBr1EAXoqBwmVo@nand.local> (Taylor Blau's message of "Thu, 23 Mar 2023 17:16:31 -0400")

Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> writes:

> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 01:56:26PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
>>
>> > I was looking in this file recently, and was reminded of the deprecation
>> > plan. The two data points above do give me a little bit of pause, but it
>> > seems like the current state is the worst of both worlds: we do not have
>> > the benefit of dropping the code, and people who try to use the command
>> > have a bad experience. So we should probably either proceed (as with
>> > this patch), or decide we need to keep pack-redundant.
>>
>> Sounds like a good thing to do.  Will queue.  Thanks.
>
> Yeah, I agree with and am persuaded by the "worst of both worlds"
> argument. I think that changing this to a die() is sensible for now.
>
> At what point would it be fair to drop this builtin entirely from the
> tree?

I notice that "git pack-redundant --help" does not say anything
about its deprecation.  We probably should add one together with
the patch in question, and then consider that the count-down timer
has finally started.

The timer should last probably for at least a few cycles.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-23 21:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-23 20:40 [RFC/PATCH] pack-redundant: escalate deprecation warning to an error Jeff King
2023-03-23 20:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-03-23 21:16   ` Taylor Blau
2023-03-23 21:23     ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2023-03-28 19:06       ` [PATCH] pack-redundant: document deprecation Jeff King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqh6ub6u1p.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).