git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>,
	Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
	Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/11] diff: rename struct diff_filespec's sha1_valid member
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 17:29:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqfus2dsbl.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160624230929.82222-7-sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> (brian m. carlson's message of "Fri, 24 Jun 2016 23:09:24 +0000")

"brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> writes:


> @@
> struct diff_filespec o;
> @@
> - o.sha1_valid
> + o.oid_valid
>
> @@
> struct diff_filespec *p;
> @@
> - p->sha1_valid
> + p->oid_valid

Totally offtopic (from Git's point of view), but why does Coccinelle
need both of these?  I recall that between v1 and v2 there were some
confusing discussions about the order of these equivalent conversions
mattering and the tool producing an incorrect conversion in v1.


  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-25  0:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-24 23:09 [PATCH v3 00/11] struct object_id, Part 4 brian m. carlson
2016-06-24 23:09 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] hex: add oid_to_hex_r brian m. carlson
2016-06-24 23:09 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] contrib/coccinelle: add basic Coccinelle transforms brian m. carlson
2016-06-24 23:09 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] Convert hashcpy with null_sha1 to hashclr brian m. carlson
2016-06-24 23:09 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] coccinelle: apply object_id Coccinelle transformations brian m. carlson
2016-06-24 23:09 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] diff: convert struct diff_filespec to struct object_id brian m. carlson
2016-06-24 23:09 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] diff: rename struct diff_filespec's sha1_valid member brian m. carlson
2016-06-25  0:29   ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2016-06-25  0:52     ` brian m. carlson
2016-06-24 23:09 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] merge-recursive: convert struct stage_data to use object_id brian m. carlson
2016-06-24 23:09 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] merge-recursive: convert struct merge_file_info to object_id brian m. carlson
2016-06-24 23:09 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] merge-recursive: convert leaf functions to use struct object_id brian m. carlson
2016-06-24 23:09 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] merge-recursive: convert merge_recursive_generic to object_id brian m. carlson
2016-06-24 23:09 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] diff: convert prep_temp_blob to struct object_id brian m. carlson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqfus2dsbl.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=j6t@kdbg.org \
    --cc=newren@gmail.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=sandals@crustytoothpaste.net \
    --cc=sbeller@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).