From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D966F1F955 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 16:56:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753237AbcG2Q4P (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jul 2016 12:56:15 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:50249 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752339AbcG2Q4J (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jul 2016 12:56:09 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5AD232120; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 12:56:07 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=iFj7weTmgzcaYubC3btsD3pajkk=; b=emhyb7 /p5Ai43hTxbsApBjaE6dvqLhPGe1LzQb5aA25U+Q0BB4SKWn7W1kINLqjmpCOxtV s8eieloj0X6r3S5KJPeL5MDvlFc/dC59KMO4PoA+8eHFMf3tZOL2HbtSlbhMaMap DXQaIR95DfhWheWDChWG2b56+q7Sc284sry7M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=AwKsRKAOHuCyGMabVNRJ8qqpav5yI0ax 2q7qiN8l+v/de3D0Zb5qPUGxRc68zRa6gyxTtprUJnWt26LTr7vGWnGWoqlrUD8A EVxPm6xMggUUOtxsUK+xrFuYc4ltUQIoZUB5jfSxN/iePDnsLjuqGr5IH7Z3k/nW BHiYoN99sMc= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD1633211F; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 12:56:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5C0C63211E; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 12:56:07 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Josh Triplett Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] git-format-patch: default to --from to avoid spoofed mails? References: <20160728211149.GA371@x> <20160729000507.GA3149@x> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 09:56:05 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20160729000507.GA3149@x> (Josh Triplett's message of "Thu, 28 Jul 2016 17:05:07 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 57E79518-55AD-11E6-8729-89D312518317-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Josh Triplett writes: > So, it seems exceedingly unlikely to me that this would result in > unnecessary in-body "From:" headers. Yup, Peff elsewhere on the thread gave the same conclusion, and after reading the codepaths involved again, I agree.