From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EBC21FD99 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 20:54:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932845AbcHJUyk (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Aug 2016 16:54:40 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:59064 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932761AbcHJSJv convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Aug 2016 14:09:51 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A950F35409; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 12:33:28 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=HjVHPi96GkbN SQYxmQEabEx9VtI=; b=YSbZdMRayw5mw2rCmriClG5GDUydv9SQwAWCIS5sYf3Y 328qitiGXYuc5qo0y1b6rrZgmBDNLJJ4WfKhVpepXK0Crln5A8767u6IU6Wd6+za 81+t0fPr31A5HF2+Qm7ZB09xN2+WC/pTraEZUVWRfoy01KcHiMxsCaUWdwk4/XA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=d18r0t ZjtSeAw6VAmxlHub++HGp3fCGE7g8ca14jmNgeO6IeESFIa97Np04n2UA6TmG6jm hAWjCCw39ymFzlKn3+CBOzLlDjqGcwz+YFU2Qby4nUxVZiDkUVv0LMU3lph6A29m a9FldcFE+L1oHaCPFsgO/YYn9H0APqXko07+E= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A04FE35408; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 12:33:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3384C35407; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 12:33:28 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Ren=C3=A9?= Scharfe , Git List Subject: Re: [PATCH] merge: use string_list_split() in add_strategies() References: <57A4FEAF.3040208@web.de> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 09:33:26 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Wed, 10 Aug 2016 14:31:34 +0200 (CEST)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 2ABC3A8E-5F18-11E6-B356-89D312518317-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Johannes Schindelin writes: > All true, but I guess this type of complexity would really complexify > René's patch too much, so I am comfortable with the patch as-is. Yeah, good that we reached the same conclusion, as my point was that for_each_word() would not be all that useful.