Re: [PATCH 1/2] for_each_bisect_ref(): don't trim refnames

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:

>> Since we obviously don't have even a single test for "--bisect", that
>> might be worth adding.
>
> It turns out we do, but none that actually check that we use the default
> refnames. So maybe squash this in?

Sounds sensible.  Thanks.

>
> diff --git a/t/t6002-rev-list-bisect.sh b/t/t6002-rev-list-bisect.sh
> index 3bf2759ea..534903bbd 100755
> --- a/t/t6002-rev-list-bisect.sh
> +++ b/t/t6002-rev-list-bisect.sh
> @@ -235,4 +235,18 @@ test_sequence "--bisect"
>  
>  #
>  #
> +
> +test_expect_success '--bisect can default to good/bad refs' '
> +	git update-ref refs/bisect/bad c3 &&
> +	good=$(git rev-parse b1) &&
> +	git update-ref refs/bisect/good-$good $good &&
> +	good=$(git rev-parse c1) &&
> +	git update-ref refs/bisect/good-$good $good &&
> +
> +	# the only thing between c3 and c1 is c2
> +	git rev-parse c2 >expect &&
> +	git rev-list --bisect >actual &&
> +	test_cmp expect actual
> +'
> +
>  test_done