From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD85D1F406 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 19:57:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752509AbdLLT5b (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Dec 2017 14:57:31 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:63854 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752329AbdLLT5b (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Dec 2017 14:57:31 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B24F5C0888; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 14:57:30 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=9Dy0yc+0O7gV/nWxgNRVUVcessM=; b=Q4ATlq EFGLH1gC/ul6iypSdczMzNAJApaOm7XQfdCGt/RSWkRksiS+ELvhYssHpCujfQtC AU3bMxDS3BRjQ0AEt/It83LXw7O2moZCkCoo8dDrlO8Z2iucBsPcxZUtg6whuZyu xiBrhc4DcEpi5I+fhhDDrwn/xj9wqURmqGcao= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=iQIC2VWnhwtU/Gk5DpNwBGkTjsfYH+FR ngO8MzezlWj/k9FhyExXz/baRGQy2uUNbCFErJhT/4fi+kWiFoE767nNMi+gV2C6 Os5UzHe9uhMy/VkGTMuI2K4iQ1jd0GqrRKJOIwQod9t1QjrbANrbic2eL/KEE0TF YEa0O1TYUs0= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAC39C0887; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 14:57:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2926AC0886; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 14:57:30 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jonathan Tan Cc: Ramsay Jones , GIT Mailing-list , =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason Subject: Re: [PATCH] Makefile: allow NO_DC_SHA1_SUBMODULE to be set in config.mak References: <7272c221-c1b6-ca41-3be4-329275e94b8a@ramsayjones.plus.com> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 11:57:28 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Tue, 12 Dec 2017 11:53:54 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: AF831230-DF76-11E7-9B2F-8EF31968708C-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano writes: > Makes sense. The patch looks scary by appearing to move the > includes far to the front of the Makefile, but it in fact is moving > the NO_DC_SHA1_SUBMODULE block slightly down and it is a sensible > and safe move. A completely unrelated tangent. This was a good change to try your anchored diff on. Viewing this change with $ git show --anchored='include config.mak' looks a lot less scary than the way it is shown by default (which matches what was posted on the list). Good job.