git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Alexandr Miloslavskiy via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexandr Miloslavskiy <alexandr.miloslavskiy@syntevo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] parse_branchname_arg(): introduce expect_commit_only
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 11:18:32 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqfthhe92v.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a84633a44474aa25bd1101a9ca2a5d9687900bf2.1574969538.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (Alexandr Miloslavskiy via GitGitGadget's message of "Thu, 28 Nov 2019 19:32:15 +0000")

"Alexandr Miloslavskiy via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
writes:

> From: Alexandr Miloslavskiy <alexandr.miloslavskiy@syntevo.com>
>
> `has_dash_dash` unexpectedly takes `opts->accept_pathspec` into account.

You also touched the code that depends on opts->accept_pathspec in
the earlier step 1/5; these two steps seem harder to reason about
than necessary---I wonder if it is easier to explain and understand
if these two steps are merged into one and explained together?

> diff --git a/builtin/checkout.c b/builtin/checkout.c
> index 655b389756..5c6131dbe6 100644
> --- a/builtin/checkout.c
> +++ b/builtin/checkout.c
> @@ -1123,7 +1123,7 @@ static int parse_branchname_arg(int argc, const char **argv,
>  	const char **new_branch = &opts->new_branch;
>  	const char *arg;
>  	int dash_dash_pos;
> -	int has_dash_dash = 0;
> +	int has_dash_dash = 0, expect_commit_only = 0;
>  	int i;
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -1194,7 +1194,10 @@ static int parse_branchname_arg(int argc, const char **argv,
>  		    die(_("only one reference expected, %d given."), dash_dash_pos);
>  	}
>  
> -	opts->count_checkout_paths = !opts->quiet && !has_dash_dash;
> +	if (has_dash_dash)
> +	    expect_commit_only = 1;

Non-standard indentation here.

> +	opts->count_checkout_paths = !opts->quiet && !expect_commit_only;

OK.  count_checkout_paths is relevant only when checking out paths
out of a tree-ish, so "expect-commit-only" would be false in such a
situation.  On the other hand, if we were checking out a branch (or
detaching), we must have a commit and a tree-ish is insufficient,
so expect_commit_only would be true in such a case.

Makes sense.  I am wondering if we still need has_dash_dash, and
also if expect_commit_only is the best name for the variable.

Thanks.

> @@ -1210,10 +1213,10 @@ static int parse_branchname_arg(int argc, const char **argv,
>  		 */
>  		int recover_with_dwim = dwim_new_local_branch_ok;
>  
> -		int could_be_checkout_paths = !has_dash_dash &&
> +		int could_be_checkout_paths = !expect_commit_only &&
>  			check_filename(opts->prefix, arg);
>  
> -		if (!has_dash_dash && !no_wildcard(arg))
> +		if (!expect_commit_only && !no_wildcard(arg))
>  			recover_with_dwim = 0;
>  
>  		/*
> @@ -1242,7 +1245,7 @@ static int parse_branchname_arg(int argc, const char **argv,
>  		}
>  
>  		if (!recover_with_dwim) {
> -			if (has_dash_dash)
> +			if (expect_commit_only)
>  				die(_("invalid reference: %s"), arg);
>  			return 0;
>  		}
> @@ -1253,7 +1256,7 @@ static int parse_branchname_arg(int argc, const char **argv,
>  	if (!opts->source_tree)                   /* case (1): want a tree */
>  		die(_("reference is not a tree: %s"), arg);
>  
> -	if (!has_dash_dash) {	/* case (3).(d) -> (1) */
> +	if (!expect_commit_only) {	/* case (3).(d) -> (1) */
>  		/*
>  		 * Do not complain the most common case
>  		 *	git checkout branch

  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-18 19:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-28 19:32 [PATCH 0/5] parse_branchname_arg(): make code easier to understand Alexandr Miloslavskiy via GitGitGadget
2019-11-28 19:32 ` [PATCH 1/5] parse_branchname_arg(): fix dash_dash_pos, drop argcount Alexandr Miloslavskiy via GitGitGadget
2019-12-18 18:52   ` Junio C Hamano
2019-12-19 18:03     ` Alexandr Miloslavskiy
2019-11-28 19:32 ` [PATCH 2/5] parse_branchname_arg(): introduce expect_commit_only Alexandr Miloslavskiy via GitGitGadget
2019-12-18 19:18   ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2019-12-19 18:03     ` Alexandr Miloslavskiy
2019-11-28 19:32 ` [PATCH 3/5] parse_branchname_arg(): update code comments Alexandr Miloslavskiy via GitGitGadget
2019-11-28 19:32 ` [PATCH 4/5] parse_branchname_arg(): refactor the decision making Alexandr Miloslavskiy via GitGitGadget
2019-11-28 19:32 ` [PATCH 5/5] t2024: cover more cases Alexandr Miloslavskiy via GitGitGadget

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqfthhe92v.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=alexandr.miloslavskiy@syntevo.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).