From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BEDA1F487 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 05:19:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725911AbgCYFTc (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Mar 2020 01:19:32 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:65526 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725263AbgCYFTb (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Mar 2020 01:19:31 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26E56512A4; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 01:19:31 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=zR4cSyxvQiyDDKLPo3c4oR4ap8Q=; b=HB37hd 3yOksk6XmowwSwuLenRmwWmdVG2MCBDDq4Hs5KxbxMJHu5xGzxiVUZHjp5pT506X Vwvtl+jMjfknkMYH47FhacPErIMhYClKZ4wb3Vz++ChJDUbhVDQlWdLMcEu1vG5K ln7x8dmnb2aiGMkCbRcgd8d5kHl0VwY+q0RNw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=UCK1RVzsjgl9z+UNhHpPROtWGsRZE7w4 Z8M6zasB+T6Pv0oaAhTFRXhb+WEu/FTnR8jo6U+BQpktw32Hb9sL7l6AGUsKEimQ JshzJePg2G+BCzGhQtgswp3lM5xXQ4+y6xAmwYcS8UqJNNlx6wDSJq+dST42dgFP XdPuxW+CFNU= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E11D512A3; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 01:19:31 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A01DD512A2; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 01:19:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jiang Xin Cc: Git List Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] New proc-receive hook for centralized workflow References: <20200313122318.78000-1-zhiyou.jx@alibaba-inc.com> <20200322131815.11872-1-worldhello.net@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 22:19:29 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20200322131815.11872-1-worldhello.net@gmail.com> (Jiang Xin's message of "Sun, 22 Mar 2020 09:18:10 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 3496F6B8-6E58-11EA-B413-D1361DBA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jiang Xin writes: > Changes since v2 and v3: > > * Implement a on-the-wire protocol, and add new test helper to test > the on-the-wire protocol. See patch 2/5. > > * Refactor report() on both server and client side for reporting of > proc-receive. See patch 5/5. > > > Jiang Xin (5): > transport: not report a non-head push as a branch > receive-pack: add new proc-receive hook > refs.c: refactor to reuse ref_is_hidden() > receive-pack: new config receive.procReceiveRefs > receive-pack: refactor report for proc-receive t5516 detects breakage of these patches that are queued directly on top of 2.26. The tip of 'pu' tonight includes this, and fails. E.g. https://travis-ci.org/github/git/git/builds/666579791 Thanks.