From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8CAD1F9E0 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 19:52:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726765AbgD3TwB (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Apr 2020 15:52:01 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:63181 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726455AbgD3TwA (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Apr 2020 15:52:00 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A78360189; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 15:51:58 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=AgkAE+N+SZu1gteELjR/S09w5WQ=; b=HBHUE9 fQPkHm/dT8DBrCukKGmPzuera3SMeuDp2dbDgh78AiQE2a1dA8VoNUHPZgYeg3CG UCmDjz3tT0awM5djd95Pf/gycwIQAC1TmsWmyH76NlADZiR+/f4DqXYOY6qht241 i7g95uvvJknpiO86yt6OCg03lo9oGpFdwu8UI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=H5YTra/MFwipGRJSSRRW9jOZg4DnzakG Gx+wR6FKDnuNoOyHOB2E0Zg4X7m8TfQnHaQIXABGD/mr36oV9utERG8pZEcwCNTu I+KD58BQEk+U8yL8yCyZ8TYtPn6JKNqwjIHtYHtTAKAMdkr0eQ7V0FTgeqsRbOQT X9fNzJaJ6io= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9197E60188; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 15:51:58 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 212FA60187; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 15:51:58 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Taylor Blau Cc: Ivan Tham , git@vger.kernel.org, "brian m . carlson" Subject: Re: [PATCH] branch: add '-' to delete previous branch References: <20200429130133.520981-1-pickfire@riseup.net> <20200429185851.GF83442@syl.local> <20200430145221.z3lpgjstybqztfqb@arch> <20200430155904.GA30682@syl.local> Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 12:51:57 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20200430155904.GA30682@syl.local> (Taylor Blau's message of "Thu, 30 Apr 2020 09:59:04 -0600") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 0CFD826C-8B1C-11EA-B1B1-C28CBED8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Taylor Blau writes: > It is the case that 'git branch -D @{-N}' already works, which was > surprising to me. I am suggesting that you make documenting the existent > behavior a new first patch. > > Of course, that might be the only patch that you end up sending in v2, > since it seems that consensus has formed around not supposing '-' as a > shorthand for '@{-1}' with 'git branch -D'. Thanks for concisely summarizing the current status of the discussion.