From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54F751F55B for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 23:16:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726669AbgFJXQu (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2020 19:16:50 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com ([173.228.157.52]:60758 "EHLO pb-smtp20.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726350AbgFJXQu (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2020 19:16:50 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58939DDBF4; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 19:16:48 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=NzbcbbjLF4SviSv2+uSZ6ion0Bs=; b=S28HWX t+TCkckwnep0oyDFHhHItsl0/oGvRq06kp5icDil9fUs+D08idNRJqin03Hy9RSu HyhqG2v1+FtXM/cK5r0GsOtfCJuQCr9zKKG+DtQwWTvn1/xLMW5PngvBcGT72n/6 SRwjJrZqG3XNazgyCTPJDiLk/eMvJec4o0jFo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=Sy9x50TNYRZRuivSNUvCei6uwc2lJNcf n0BT2ab0KFIGe1ZC+YUlXbSaiaEIO2FkucE8/RG1NWuAqY4NthX+wM6ieyNuv52V I65X+pFXwNji3IwKwJ7L9tsWcpwHya/ztfFOXxhAgWoI0rulXI7JBJg2t5M341O9 ysHQ4dxPPaM= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FE38DDBF3; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 19:16:48 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [35.196.173.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 73091DDBF2; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 19:16:44 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jonathan Tan Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] CDN offloading update References: Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 16:16:42 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Jonathan Tan's message of "Wed, 10 Jun 2020 13:57:14 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 73277466-AB70-11EA-BBF0-B0405B776F7B-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jonathan Tan writes: > Thanks, Junio, for taking a look at this. > > This version is based on cc/upload-pack-data-2. I thought of retaining > the base from the original version, but trying out the rebase showed > that there were some code movements that would clutter the range-diff > anyway, so I went ahead with the rebase. I think rebasing is not just justifiable, but is the right thing to do in this case, as the topics fairly heavily steps each other's toe. Thanks.