From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 248151F66E for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 21:52:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726623AbgIFVwd (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Sep 2020 17:52:33 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:63028 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726292AbgIFVwb (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Sep 2020 17:52:31 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DD2479C69; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 17:52:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=sasl; bh=DIxEZTcT2ChUiAMXRw3xquOFfD4=; b=ZzBNvB1p8uh6kIWa3E3d qZ8Rimz6TvHdqX0jviT0ndRxXzHD9WJ4H+dPgZVCj4+g+wqVLCU87N2tMSQshPa7 5P/BAlWDzbwGfsaFPAQGVIamEuoGnrVQP8rFZB8f2fpCpYuVZt9QNOA5ul3Hl53o fpRT6DB6pRVz0z4QYEJGYp4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=CFzJ7ccrox93fddcLCAmD1p81vSKIYHKhd9LgcxaZY4ovF yZBNfFj9iSLEhhHj/TU1SDD+l+kVSKMt1bn0QZqBez8p+qswkDDYYMFzc5nNcv/L qB83k/iZLg504fmaWpnigRTPzM8io8SFapmyMLgkap70Rxe7eV/illAqHxXEI= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F7179C68; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 17:52:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.75.7.245]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D966D79C67; Sun, 6 Sep 2020 17:52:28 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Victor Toni Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: Aborting git rebase --edit-todo References: Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2020 14:52:28 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 4225A544-F08B-11EA-A900-2F5D23BA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Victor Toni writes: > Junio C Hamano writes: >> >> Victor Toni writes: >> >> > Personally I would like to see your approach (1,2,3) implemented >> > because it is not destructive. If the user wants to achieve something >> > different he can retry. >> >> Obviously I agree that the approach would be nicer than the status >> quo. It would not be as trivial as a microproject, but would be a >> good bite-sized starter-task for those aspiring developers who want >> to dip their toes in the water to start hacking on the codebase ;-) >> > Nice try ;) For the record I didn't try _you_. I was writing for general audience, among which there are aspiring developers seeking a starter-task. Whether you are part of that audience was immaterial (even though it would have been nice if you were) ;-). Thanks.