From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C5ED1F66F for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 18:25:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728815AbgKDSZr (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2020 13:25:47 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:54944 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726801AbgKDSZq (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2020 13:25:46 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C28AAA2781; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 13:25:45 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=iDbQsMu4U8vw5BBEocseuRYNydA=; b=HqrHSu NMdq6ENYU/Jm3xAbJR5LRFThS4DJjwpzwfiirVmN6IFDcZCpGOPiAWhRYUovcSXb CX0Wv8IX1EZFhda0eF54m9XQmdnQwQj1mn0U30ByzbkUqdY5z6zxhtPU5LwJ+OcX HdBsD31VzUq0Iom/TNmZP9clKmMs4NpqOWGPM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=KTeScBlH44fxKG5jtI+lJtEgNFemICyk XNfyp51GSvm+4mijkYLcp7JMA1CmgYpLEXOh/Ee2rsrlDdna7ka1o/iLvCKQLENH zP4VN3MPw4RscCRNh8kD7eVE/eg7655IS3iLcCmk/U5ziy0pwNpqKX9MHhxcOo1o M3ixdaVGPjY= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9AE9A2780; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 13:25:45 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.75.7.245]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3BDF7A277F; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 13:25:45 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Daniel Duvall Cc: Jeff King , Git Users Subject: Re: [PATCH] upload-pack: allow stateless client EOF just prior to haves References: <1604022059-18527-1-git-send-email-dan@mutual.io> <20201030044012.GA3259692@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20201030090902.GA3268509@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20201104133342.GB3030480@coredump.intra.peff.net> Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 10:25:44 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Daniel Duvall's message of "Wed, 4 Nov 2020 06:06:44 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 275E92DE-1ECB-11EB-9045-74DE23BA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Daniel Duvall writes: > On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 5:33 AM Jeff King wrote: >> >> On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 01:10:53PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> >> > Yeah, I'd agree that punting on v0 and making sure the current >> > version would work well is good enough. >> > >> > I lost track and am not sure what's the current status of the topic >> > is. Is v3 [*1*] the latest and satisfactory one? >> >> Yeah, I just read over v3 again and it looks good to me. Thanks, Daniel! >> >> -Peff > > Contributing this tiny patch was a rewarding experience, getting to > know Git more intimately and collaborating with you all. Thanks so > much! Thanks, both of you. Marked v3 to be ready for 'next'.