From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 511911F66F for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 21:57:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728312AbgKTVws (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Nov 2020 16:52:48 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:58310 "EHLO pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727150AbgKTVws (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Nov 2020 16:52:48 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4901810921D; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 16:52:46 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=Lj7Ee9O3kBYkxBUJ7Lzr8TgG6p0=; b=g+EK+P txRspUjgd/8TvrV2hSKJrWHhME+i7cN6bVLOsfZ2VwRWVVeckbLDg9ETtlj8AqwJ TIqQuD/yXD8m4D3PcRROHfI8nrz11Hlu21CFtijobvVAYkBuQBpNqct5GlZJr/iA FvzGva3hx0ISqLqJ6s5gGVeLGSvrSLObEVNGY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=vhOu5ltcRcP4rP03cE45NGoDU5rRM5Gt +5AyaUtaD4r3iIpY1n1aHeFTzZFxyOozcjZUDDsQLC2hJF8vLGn4HH2CW2+66TZR 9aPpJMawgNyBlSvwp1oL+gqjggkKyKfjL234RGbhXKnLAqySYIKz5+3FcMCRdEU5 s8OosTD6rck= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42AA310921C; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 16:52:46 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8D55B10921B; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 16:52:43 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Derrick Stolee Cc: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Nieder , Emily Shaffer , Johannes Schindelin , Jeff King , Derrick Stolee Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] config: add --literal-value option References: <87k0ugp3mg.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> <3a347d16-8549-5244-c7db-82b97d7311de@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 13:52:41 -0800 In-Reply-To: <3a347d16-8549-5244-c7db-82b97d7311de@gmail.com> (Derrick Stolee's message of "Fri, 20 Nov 2020 13:51:16 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: B7E171BC-2B7A-11EB-83AE-D609E328BF65-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Derrick Stolee writes: > Since there is already asymmetry between the key and value (only one > mode, --get-regexp, has a "name_regex"), I would prefer to treat the > value_regex in isolation here. Ah, I forgot about --get-regexp vs --get; so the ship has already sailed---I agree with you that --(fixed|literal)-value is all we need. Thanks.