From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BD321F934 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 02:07:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729038AbhALCDw (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2021 21:03:52 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:58192 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725601AbhALCDv (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2021 21:03:51 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 673A0A469C; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 21:03:09 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=KACYAmES+W72UUXfmN3dBXUIRhQ=; b=WX54QU 2g0S/+3Q0PTnn3ELgtpyQugRxJfol9L/FrYfDzZiyl0Ju7VRh5CQ6ryzv4xDiYZU tkfTJrpJIzPeF8vmsCZA0ujgD1Y3Htu6PSYhG5e6CdeLtF9xBBUVESGWSwmxSOGy LRHNre5OLtwRH5to1TaxI4a4Tgp8wGw4mV1s8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=WBo/EvcZh1P+4CLQ5D7cPqwKp8HHMZiz wsLvRhts9ormH91KpEpqJGv4w6KmGsOqg/fc9XlA4OGiq/Jjs4ogP2YKUZzKeNVn ayTao3gIoLKt2L9w8BvwWcrcC5jEj7jjz9bHHB0jOdsf0zmsNP87nh1c3wSgoDHC oNv4FFSFvRQ= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CD9EA469B; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 21:03:09 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D025BA469A; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 21:03:08 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: "brian m. carlson" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Eric Sunshine , Denton Liu , Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Support for commits signed by multiple algorithms References: <20210111003740.1319996-1-sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> <20210111035840.2437737-1-sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 18:03:08 -0800 In-Reply-To: (brian m. carlson's message of "Mon, 11 Jan 2021 23:29:56 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 511FD54E-547A-11EB-967D-74DE23BA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org "brian m. carlson" writes: > I just noticed this because I'm now getting to the case where we write > (and sign) both SHA-1 and SHA-256 versions of commits and I thought I'd > better send in a patch sooner rather than later, since there's a lot > more prep work (surprise) before we get to anything interesting. Uncomfortably excited to hear this ;-)