From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B96A31F9FC for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 04:27:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229872AbhCVE00 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Mar 2021 00:26:26 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com ([173.228.157.52]:55822 "EHLO pb-smtp20.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229436AbhCVEZz (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Mar 2021 00:25:55 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADD71112052; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 00:25:54 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=yWzg6NYakCbiuuNTc5NLMvyKdPk=; b=VW962q WJ9jzIj70Ou3sA36r/iWwFNO3S28iQpx8Ju5ephZgKjUUilXRoSMRmviuDTJvq4Y yAhcrtKU0LHGOFhwOzrm6oRX+mxisxeZyqCiEJe4TQ7IRXORJragZScVgWA5Q95O TWsS+Q8PyqdH/cz/DBT/0ztU7CzUFdhLiSbds= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=BCgQ5ERwZyNiDck90roFgDy+LLs1N1Ud MegCNhKbHs1MlJ5XyDKBJYBsQb9D4/krXNIEvm6HCxt7B4Ddpt0Ry+iOQyHBi79z bTOXTbjmR/WNBYLRfStukUFhgylAY3fz59RO0Beu4k6UjvCHXjJBPYDxxlIi6q0z pOk6EMGCvIg= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7A27112050; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 00:25:54 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F21D111204F; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 00:25:51 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: "Georgios Kontaxis" Cc: "Georgios Kontaxis via GitGitGadget" , git@vger.kernel.org, =?utf-8?Q?=C3=86var_Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0_Bjarmason?= , "brian m. carlson" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] gitweb: redacted e-mail addresses feature. References: <14d3cda766b0212ca9d8204eba35aa4d.squirrel@mail.kodaksys.org> Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2021 21:25:50 -0700 In-Reply-To: <14d3cda766b0212ca9d8204eba35aa4d.squirrel@mail.kodaksys.org> (Georgios Kontaxis's message of "Sun, 21 Mar 2021 23:14:14 -0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: AFA7871A-8AC6-11EB-A42A-E43E2BB96649-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org "Georgios Kontaxis" writes: >> Quite honestly, if a site claims to offer a 'patch' download UI but >> returns corrupt data back, I would say it is much worse than not >> offering the service at all. Perhaps disabling the 'patch' feature >> in repositories that enable 'privacy' feature may be a much better >> approach. >> > Good point. I think I'll try that. Alternatively, we could add 'captcha' to stop crawlers, perhaps?