From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Raxel Gutierrez <raxelgutierrez09@gmail.com>,
mricon@kernel.org, patchwork@lists.ozlabs.org,
Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>,
Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>,
ZheNing Hu <adlternative@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Pain points in Git's patch flow
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 12:50:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqfszqko0k.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YHaIBvl6Mf7ztJB3@google.com> (Jonathan Nieder's message of "Tue, 13 Apr 2021 23:13:26 -0700")
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> writes:
> 3. Do you think patchwork goes in a direction that is likely to help
> with these?
So here is a real-life example.
Let's say somebody is looking at a "gentle ping" [*1*]
znh> The patch seems to have fallen into the crack.
zhn> Jeff and Junio, willing to help?
How would we figure out what happened to the patch today without
visiting patchwork would be:
1. Visit the message at lore.kernel.org/git/ [*1*]
2. Notice that it is a response to a message, and click the link to
be taken to [*2*]
3. Notice that nobody commented on the patch.
4. Type "f:zhening ref-filter" to the search box and search, with
suspicion that this was an updated version of something.
5. Click one of them in the result [*3*]
6. This time, we can tell that this seemed to have had two earlier
iterations, and after reading the discussion through, the last
one changed the course in a major way. Not just a new helper
introduced in the earlier rounds has gone away, but an existing
helper got removed.
7. All comments in the discussion for the earlier two rounds can be
read as supporting the new direction the latest round takes.
8. The fact remains that even if the direction has been endorsed
(see 7. above) nobody took a look at the implementation for the
latest round.
9. Make the final verdict.
I use my newsreader to do pretty much the equivalent of the above
without hitting https://lore.kernel.org/git/ but the above is
written to use the web interface, in order to make it reproducible
more easily by anybody on the list.
Now, how can patchwork improve the above reviewer experience, out
of the box and possibly with new helpe rools around it?
I can see #3 would immediately become obvious, and I hope #4-#5
would become unnecessary.
Anything else?
At steps #6 and #7, there is human judgment involved that may not be
automatable, but would there be some mechanism to make it easy to
help these steps if the user visits patchwork (instead of staying
in my newsreader or web interface to the lore archive)?
I am of course not expecting to automate step #9 ;-) It would be
nice though.
Thanks.
[References]
*1* https://lore.kernel.org/git/CAOLTT8Tis5Yjg8UR0c-i0BnqiFQvLXvDgxUQJ-WcP6jjQPu9cQ@mail.gmail.com/
*2* https://lore.kernel.org/git/pull.928.git.1617975348494.gitgitgadget@gmail.com/
*3* https://lore.kernel.org/git/pull.927.v2.git.1617809209164.gitgitgadget@gmail.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-16 19:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-14 6:13 Pain points in Git's patch flow Jonathan Nieder
2021-04-14 7:22 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2021-04-14 8:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-04-14 21:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-04-15 8:49 ` Denton Liu
2021-04-15 6:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-04-15 15:45 ` Son Luong Ngoc
2021-04-19 2:57 ` Eric Wong
2021-04-19 13:35 ` Theodore Ts'o
2021-04-21 10:19 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-04-28 7:21 ` Eric Wong
2021-04-28 7:05 ` Eric Wong
2021-04-15 18:25 ` Atharva Raykar
2021-04-16 19:50 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2021-04-16 20:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-02 5:35 ` ZheNing Hu
2021-04-18 8:29 ` Sebastian Schuberth
2021-04-18 20:54 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-04-19 2:58 ` Eric Wong
2021-04-19 5:54 ` Sebastian Schuberth
2021-04-19 6:04 ` Sebastian Schuberth
2021-04-19 8:26 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-04-19 19:23 ` Sebastian Schuberth
2021-04-19 22:34 ` Theodore Ts'o
2021-04-20 6:30 ` Sebastian Schuberth
2021-04-20 16:37 ` Theodore Ts'o
2021-04-30 20:45 ` Felipe Contreras
2021-04-20 10:34 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-04-19 19:36 ` Eric Wong
2021-04-19 19:49 ` Sebastian Schuberth
2021-04-19 22:00 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2021-05-08 2:10 ` dwh
2021-04-19 21:49 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2021-04-19 23:03 ` Stephen Smith
2021-05-08 2:08 ` dwh
2021-05-08 4:41 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2021-04-30 20:58 ` Felipe Contreras
2021-04-21 4:46 ` Daniel Axtens
2021-04-26 2:04 ` brian m. carlson
2021-04-26 14:24 ` Theodore Ts'o
2021-04-26 14:36 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-04-28 7:59 ` Eric Wong
2021-04-28 22:44 ` brian m. carlson
2021-04-30 20:16 ` Felipe Contreras
2021-04-30 20:35 ` Felipe Contreras
2021-04-30 21:09 ` Felipe Contreras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqfszqko0k.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=adlternative@gmail.com \
--cc=emilyshaffer@google.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
--cc=mricon@kernel.org \
--cc=patchwork@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=raxelgutierrez09@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).