From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE, URIBL_CSS,URIBL_CSS_A shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7804A1F4D7 for ; Sun, 22 May 2022 19:11:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="f5qkv0q4"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1350192AbiEVTKv (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 May 2022 15:10:51 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52470 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229542AbiEVTKt (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 May 2022 15:10:49 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (pb-smtp21.pobox.com [173.228.157.53]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53956366B0 for ; Sun, 22 May 2022 12:10:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2EA31AADF8; Sun, 22 May 2022 15:10:45 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=9GXMYUMp2MtOJpI2IoJq4h61VWvVuyCW96nZ4L NfCJE=; b=f5qkv0q4hiVOgyKkXcwjBYaZXrmXy1ZKYMt7+iY806k5MI/gn3Ic5H DyChR4FALs62Z1lFLCh6j2z7VDT4kPOIbmY8CTs6Zmz9WFk/gU2P02acJzca0qdP WXDDWfWOOwQpgIyHmq48ktH0kxKoe3aLekDM2koNtptOF238kjG9s= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCD891AADF7; Sun, 22 May 2022 15:10:45 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.83.65.128]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 93D811AADF6; Sun, 22 May 2022 15:10:42 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , Victoria Dye , Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, Eric Sunshine , Derrick Stolee , Emily Shaffer Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] ci: make Git's GitHub workflow output much more helpful References: <6b83bb83-32b9-20c9-fa02-c1c3170351c3@github.com> Date: Sun, 22 May 2022 12:10:41 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Sun, 22 May 2022 20:48:30 +0200 (CEST)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: E019C020-DA02-11EC-AEDC-CBA7845BAAA9-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Johannes Schindelin writes: > I see that this is still with the previous iteration, and therefore > exposes the same speed (or slowness) as was investigated so wonderfully by > Victoria. > > So I really do not understand why you pointed to that run, given that it Simply because your updated version came to my tree a lot after I prepared two trees that are otherwise identical for comparison to write the message you are responding to. If the new round is much improved than the previous one, that is a very good news. I do not appreciate that you have to always talk back to others in such an aggressive tone, and I do not think it is only to me, by the way. You could have said the same thing in a lot more cordial way, e.g. "There is a newer version than those being compared---could you look at this run instead for comparison, even though admittably there probably are changes in other topics in flight so the exact failures may be different?"