From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS54825 147.75.80.0/22 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from am.mirrors.kernel.org (am.mirrors.kernel.org [147.75.80.249]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD5271F4B8 for ; Fri, 3 May 2024 18:08:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=sasl header.b=HVuSvjK0; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by am.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 406B71F223D1 for ; Fri, 3 May 2024 18:08:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03A3A1586C2; Fri, 3 May 2024 18:08:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="HVuSvjK0" Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (pb-smtp1.pobox.com [64.147.108.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A5A4157E82 for ; Fri, 3 May 2024 18:08:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.70 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714759699; cv=none; b=tf6fvU3BMaPIpPQRvBXIBM/lEFTBiBZf85P1uOvdpQ2fh/6SLrSdVOQXKum/GlpH8EGuiF+6N7AxH4KQrxuvkzPmZuxElkQM0maBr9lMfUv5a6tPCVJgtATcYMMt7LpmfCy0bIZzzHvtJSBerH9DVlPYPAruYNgVa3zlZ6GTxZY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714759699; c=relaxed/simple; bh=wUFTb2TRkezNCEzAwertJdaGRrvTcn1u5QHcsOMmJS4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=iVKLgQwVnq15B02JPVqUP0R8X6ED/i6eyIj7wM2zcwO+mbgV9hrphrcI6bkQZpBMQU6p3g75/e9lUPZcdp58J1jUHn23X2kekPxYornjVokmwiXk60rpQtuNS3X1KBJ2/Rt6NkTxi/uURymzVQqpihbnPBMRBgPF2iyXN3aURt8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=HVuSvjK0; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.70 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC4062AC5E; Fri, 3 May 2024 14:08:16 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=wUFTb2TRkezN CEzAwertJdaGRrvTcn1u5QHcsOMmJS4=; b=HVuSvjK0n49wRZjldei0swQ/6z0G y1Ak3HjmmvkCgAE7/PrtiDNVNjKS4H/fjrSamHf6euUlk1DCU0IY2+sCmSJPmIYx qPUXZYgyP/MvTSMUtSKGOWyi1uzoFPCScbv9alRwLT0HPtJKNh3xiA1Q8YGqklKM bWKE3vTQnSCqZ4g= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E48472AC5D; Fri, 3 May 2024 14:08:16 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.125.120.109]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4A1672AC5C; Fri, 3 May 2024 14:08:16 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Josh Steadmon Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, avarab@gmail.com, christian.couder@gmail.com, me@ttaylorr.com, Enrico Mrass , Emily Shaffer Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] doc: describe the project's decision-making process In-Reply-To: (Josh Steadmon's message of "Fri, 3 May 2024 08:48:19 -0700") References: <20240417163244.651791-1-emrass@google.com> Date: Fri, 03 May 2024 11:08:15 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 1D3F8556-0978-11EF-B106-78DCEB2EC81B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Josh Steadmon writes: > On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 7:45=E2=80=AFAM Junio C Hamano wrote: >> >> We didn't hear any more comments on this topic, but writing down how >> the world works around here, with the goal to eventually have a set >> of project governance rules, is valuable. Otherwise loud people may >> act according to their own (unwritten) rules that annoy others and >> harm the community. [jc: do not top post]. > Yes, sorry for silence on this thread. I am working on a V2 but > probably won't have it ready today. Don't be sorry; the message was not addressed to you, but for wider community participants---especially the ones with more "clout" (or "long timers" or whatever word we would use to describe those whose opinions are trusted by others and count more) need to buy in if we were to first agree on that it is good to have a set of written rules, and to then agree on what rules to adopt. We might want to pick ideas from https://fossgovernance.org/ for example.