From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7277A20193 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 21:01:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752234AbcHKVBX (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Aug 2016 17:01:23 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:61499 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752040AbcHKVBW (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Aug 2016 17:01:22 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFB8A3246D; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 17:01:21 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=wBgU40LszXo0OUFuYPd5gHbuZ7I=; b=cWTrMt VXoEUKmMF5uudG59a9B+I9Zze0ViMmE8bXe8lYfxubYfrjXSycxv38THEVaIp5WS laajl3G6LKyPvpkdp1axFe3TJH+EIV67jSt03tRqe6X1r4dYDRLneAEV5A8lhb35 JjlsMFMUUOVYbZzQDYQXrNXmqANbB8ImTtjt8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=sPf8CW60hV5u3CAOlJxB62//NlCxApNx KGwUbWHVkJEmuWkBTWLzTr231FgKAkZyU0ah1MioQz7Dw5PlhmIGu41mhbdaYdLf 6eqQFdYIxDdHLwPnoYijCs8lgbMlaYDJJHks2X92uETBFOAUU/QfM4PE3KS8/EMg RDEYNq4VoV8= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C73B73246C; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 17:01:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3B9B33246B; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 17:01:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff Hostetler Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Hostetler Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] status: V2 porcelain status References: <1470948697-63787-1-git-send-email-git@jeffhostetler.com> Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 14:01:18 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1470948697-63787-1-git-send-email-git@jeffhostetler.com> (Jeff Hostetler's message of "Thu, 11 Aug 2016 16:51:28 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: C16C34F4-6006-11E6-B6C6-EE617A1B28F4-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff Hostetler writes: > From: Jeff Hostetler > > This patch series adds porcelain V2 format to status. > This provides detailed information about file changes > and about the current branch. > > The new output is accessed via: > git status --porcelain=v2 [--branch] > > This v7 patch series address the most recent feedback > on the unit tests. > > This series has been rebased onto a more current master > branch (to get the EMPTY_BLOB changes in the test suite). Thanks for a note. I've been queuing the series on top of f8f7adc, so I am assuming I won't see any changes in 1-8. Unfortunately I cannot be taking new rerolls or new topics for the rest of the day as I need to start today's integration cycle and I'll have to delay taking a look at this round, but from a quick glance you still seem to have a lot of dirt in the new test and I cannot quite tell if they are intended. Thanks.