From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0806C20323 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 18:15:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965446AbdCVSPi (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:15:38 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:64758 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934813AbdCVSPg (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:15:36 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE3A77DACD; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:15:34 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=QXTVKhldTNQ/9R+4rXqQILRjnB0=; b=ZB8Oic 0JU0s3F8o7Kpp1phPYGvigP/vNHEaWh0OSCQS2iVZo7HYiEk2UhDcJrjQdyo904y afCj6k7os5I4JtMCd74Dvu0x6PoOCs7V48VJ/O3gVb6N1sy2bT7L0pZWVz5yDIlY 7BKVWXrsN3F+0+DtmAD3Mcap/xnABYS86oKzo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=s/3vsebbRjaH611xrxLRqODq74+7SJrd b1tHV2ayyk5RcSQNlI5zmPIty14WNNzCQCh4PchYa4YgazePPaju3J2EoWlV4SZe /pYhXm2wWOb56O4s1sTYYJSt8Yky8j35dtcZ5VwDm9Gbh5ynCprcpqsInyYLL89K UTTAxdbvGpI= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B77CA7DACC; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:15:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 185A27DACB; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:15:34 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: Sebastian Schuberth , Git Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] t7504: document regression: reword no longer calls commit-msg References: <773531a3892fb78e8f70e540fc000bceb2c1bb7b.1490194846.git.johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 11:15:32 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Wed, 22 Mar 2017 17:09:38 +0100 (CET)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 8A956F52-0F2B-11E7-B75E-97B1B46B9B0B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Johannes Schindelin writes: > In any case, this is *test* code. So I'd prefer to have the changes to the > C code scrutinized a bit more, not the test code as long as it is obvious > what it does. I do not think the tone of this comment serves any productive purpose. People have strengths in different areas, and those who can spot issues in tests better than the C code should not be discouraged from suggesting improvements by getting scolded like this. Also remember what is "obvious" to you may not be obvious to others. Thanks.