git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Cc: Patrick Lehmann <Patrick.Lehmann@plc2.de>, Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@gmail.com>, Git Mailinglist <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Restoring detached HEADs after Git operations
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 10:55:07 -0700
Message-ID: <xmqqefufuakk.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGZ79kY0gwk7KRY2iAVTXPBjPzx+mkciVWRR2z2cDgiBjQ2uuw@mail.gmail.com>

Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> writes:

> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 2:52 AM, Patrick Lehmann
> <Patrick.Lehmann@plc2.de> wrote:
>> Hello Lars,
>>
>> for your questions:
>>> If there are multiple branches with the same hash then your script would pick the first one. Can you imagine a situation where this would be a problem?
>>
>> I can't think of a good solution to resolve it automatically. Maybe a script could print that there are multiple possibilities and it choose the first branch in the list.
>>
>>
>>> Plus, you are looking only at local branches. Wouldn't it make sense to look at remote branches, too?
>>
>> This is also related to restoring tags. If we go this way, we should have this priority list:
>> - local branches
>> - remote branches
>
> For remote branches you would create a local branch of the same name
> (if such a branch would not exist, possibly setting it up to track that remote
> branch)?
>
>> - tags
>
> as said in the other email and similar to remote branches, we'd not want to have
> HEAD pointing to them directly but somehow have a local branch.

Let's step back a bit.  We detach the HEAD for a good reason, no?
Why is it a good idea to move them back on to a branch picked among
multiple ones that all happen to be pointing at the same commit?

The user may build on a history of a submodule, and then may push
the result out to a particular branch at the other side; that is
when being on a named branch in the submodule becomes useful, but
even then I do not think randomly picking one branch and be on it
is a good thing to do.

I would understand the workflow would go more like so:

 - You do something at the superproject (e.g. create a new branch X
   from an existing commit and check it out), which results in
   submodules' HEADs getting detached at the commits bound to the
   superproject's tree.

 - Because you want to make changes to both submodules and the
   superproject in a consistent way, you'd want to commit changes to
   all of these repositories and the push the result out in an
   atomic way.

 - Hence you tell "Hey, Git, I want all the submodules that I
   modified to be on branch X" from the superproject.

   - This may succeed in a submodule where X is a new name, or the
     current tip of branch X is an ancestor of the detached HEAD.

   - This may fail in a submodule where there is branch X that does
     not want to move to the detached HEAD's state.  In this latter
     case, the user needs to deal with the situation (perhaps the
     old X is expendable; perhaps the HEAD's commit may need to be
     merged to old X; perhaps there are other cases).

though.

  parent reply index

Thread overview: 14+ messages in thread (expand / mbox.gz / Atom feed / [top])
2017-06-19  8:46 Patrick Lehmann
2017-06-19  9:30 ` Lars Schneider
2017-06-19  9:52   ` AW: " Patrick Lehmann
2017-06-19 16:37     ` Stefan Beller
2017-06-19 17:34       ` AW: " Patrick Lehmann
2017-06-19 17:47         ` Stefan Beller
2017-06-19 18:09           ` AW: " Patrick Lehmann
2017-06-19 19:21             ` Stefan Beller
2017-06-19 20:13               ` AW: " Patrick Lehmann
2017-06-19 17:55       ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2017-06-19 19:11         ` Stefan Beller
2017-06-19 16:31 ` Stefan Beller
2017-06-19 17:01 ` Jeff King
2017-06-19 17:56 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to, --cc,
  and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqefufuakk.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=Patrick.Lehmann@plc2.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=larsxschneider@gmail.com \
    --cc=sbeller@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://public-inbox.org/git
	git clone --mirror http://ou63pmih66umazou.onion/git
	git clone --mirror http://czquwvybam4bgbro.onion/git
	git clone --mirror http://hjrcffqmbrq6wope.onion/git

Newsgroups are available over NNTP:
	nntp://news.public-inbox.org/inbox.comp.version-control.git
	nntp://ou63pmih66umazou.onion/inbox.comp.version-control.git
	nntp://czquwvybam4bgbro.onion/inbox.comp.version-control.git
	nntp://hjrcffqmbrq6wope.onion/inbox.comp.version-control.git
	nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git

 note: .onion URLs require Tor: https://www.torproject.org/
       or Tor2web: https://www.tor2web.org/

AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox