From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_DKIM_INVALID, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D947920401 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 19:22:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752112AbdFUTWM (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jun 2017 15:22:12 -0400 Received: from mail-pg0-f50.google.com ([74.125.83.50]:33187 "EHLO mail-pg0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752042AbdFUTWL (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jun 2017 15:22:11 -0400 Received: by mail-pg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id f127so4309404pgc.0 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 12:22:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=EwUthYamjbbGK7ayOcPKLwKBeASqckesUGPCWM+fv6Y=; b=CY6pw8WsA0YzAa+W2B+X5LujoYO1e0bNaWQQJMc/ODB/v8Ck99nhIWfx2zdVokVv/6 M1P/9P0Z/KvaPaGYaHEirWHO8YymjDFndqZecVYZHo6SUqqGsimJYtk4iL7UP8bTGMwc CrO3+pVxT/3bhvuESHSWEoNDyK/VoPG1MeKfsC5QzmYgD1O0M4MWega4I0ktCoXiBlzE 4LzA3B4NzI5Pc1a7r9WUjWOoFju5elt5mEwaSbD5LLbog1NtuLqORE6wXamEbQLy2Mru sTlc6eV8024JLLpnVYRsGZVpndOrsWbC6vEwvhHgFyuZCCbiPJq56RviSPO8HJbI7lOo +kdw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=EwUthYamjbbGK7ayOcPKLwKBeASqckesUGPCWM+fv6Y=; b=ifkAXWcUGcZKDWWjs6B1WVEwxRn5S/vJCapVbHv79545e+XpJ0ufr4KQMZddtoW1wO XCkeekOnG5Y6eFBV//to9Ndz4BlmD8Blu3DGgQ0ve36crsTYRRRqEziUslAzsgUSjtwM UeeU2NU7fsD7EnUJUe5s4sZ4DdLCtWvsOe0ScOoQoYXGQ5+JxQyGO54vYLTshT0u0VbZ i/0FVhJtRSk7aGfBiRLkX+9uenILAjoEwSokrK4xifw4Ck4Kc7sjgxHSkwlBn/Sc22pG ajggIjejhtjby/bBmd5Gbo219j+eSALBs4gZJw2TCIqki/8PROm66pftjEW8uKNLeBdo X2TA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOwpYCxftWixy7noveEm5rghiwGUiYMnsTCAyoYMk8MP0C8I/0tH pspzaZxRqmLYiQ== X-Received: by 10.101.73.193 with SMTP id t1mr37938819pgs.115.1498072930226; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 12:22:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2620:0:1000:8622:b0bd:d7d3:4f2e:5016]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 204sm33843919pfu.23.2017.06.21.12.22.08 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 21 Jun 2017 12:22:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: Stefan Beller , David Turner , "git\@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: update 64-bit core.packedGitLimit default References: <20170420204118.17856-1-dturner@twosigma.com> <20170420210254.f4ykyi46bso5uj3o@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20170621135130.6724hnoovcjfduto@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20170621180618.6yc433nwpi4d5wof@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20170621185307.xu6rcnj2y3jvdati@sigill.intra.peff.net> Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 12:22:08 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20170621185307.xu6rcnj2y3jvdati@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Wed, 21 Jun 2017 14:53:07 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: > Of course, the best alternative is retaining access to the packs, which > is what typically happens now on 64-bit systems (it's just that the > packedGitLimit was set pointlessly low). I'm not sure if you're asking > in general, or as a last-ditch effort for 32-bit systems. As the last-ditch effort for 32-bit boxen. But at this point in time we probably do not care about them too deeply?