From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C7AE202A0 for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 15:12:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965270AbdKGPMr (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Nov 2017 10:12:47 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:65012 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933842AbdKGPMq (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Nov 2017 10:12:46 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30E9EAF7E0; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 10:12:46 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=8umhWy5YDsNtYJgeVEZxyz4qrsM=; b=VoiHDK Qa4o9ilDV6UVXwPyzhS/9byeG9AHpBvrtnivBirXGQMoUlwXGv1DQbr1XvNYXeDe 0d6JqXTRrPJoM8HjiTlFxcQkNA26aOv3oUsyXwHctTnnSIIqLOqsyZPaClgp2W4S 7b1YzZhN8EoDZmD7KbwcBAVire/y5kiy6bjTc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=SGNuUl6pNIg0UTwo0Pd8zBbeoxNtORbl mgwG2Krk5+57YUcf9s1eqTm4kg5TPTJKFHsiTqER4gHpVUraEF+nncV55mVzZQrk qyJhoZz/5iPTvroQfC0KWk/AD1xDewOrqgL7X8FWMzdgO5ULh4zaBdjJ0jJ5ycmN 8niSxBSSNQg= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2947BAF7DF; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 10:12:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 99BFBAF7DC; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 10:12:45 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Matthieu Moy Cc: Antoine =?utf-8?Q?Beaupr=C3=A9?= , Git Mailing List Subject: Re: future of the mediawiki extension? References: <87vaix731f.fsf@curie.anarc.at> <158227903.238854.1510040782947.JavaMail.zimbra@matthieu-moy.fr> Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 00:12:44 +0900 In-Reply-To: <158227903.238854.1510040782947.JavaMail.zimbra@matthieu-moy.fr> (Matthieu Moy's message of "Tue, 7 Nov 2017 08:46:22 +0100 (CET)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 1BE0A290-C3CE-11E7-B0E5-575F0C78B957-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Matthieu Moy writes: > I realize I didn't answer this point. The reason you didn't see any > update recently is just that there haven't been any release and > actually not much development for a while on git-multimail. That is perfectly fine. > I still have a list of "would be nice to have" features, but it seems > users are essentially happy with git-multimail as it is (or at least, > aren't unhappy enough to send patches or discuss interesting issues), > I haven't received any bug report or pull-requests for a long time. > > But I still do maintain git-multimail and I will continue updating it > in git.git.