From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B460A1F463 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 22:02:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726090AbfLMWC5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Dec 2019 17:02:57 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com ([173.228.157.52]:60869 "EHLO pb-smtp20.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725554AbfLMWC5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Dec 2019 17:02:57 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7EC5A889C; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 17:02:56 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=5IgQAv5AsTf5JB/gFm57Ihk8ARI=; b=xrLiTh y71avSwMeikE36ZNfMZWYCrSvPx1jfma2k+7S/wBaGY5fI8up/0Sf8rEbyUiDgdX jPOPlV3UnjdeL8aKUri86JLGdnVHopsx5nlRPq7eKzmgIyuigrSyzIF78EHTmMB5 7Ps++avyllwiGOlKlmgKQgUk+5cN069Uk3K5I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=fZQvR9KVrZb9raC8yLvVBZuXCQ9V4Kt2 WnHWEzGEorJ5HLnbf+UEbV11LdopTbcOryWI7LCCQm3n3cf+TRoP3QINwAgxxJRX b5QlocDvIrM94SxCwVGCcR34zPVB6dalLq8OzDatb01KMgACWrFs9xhz/mdXwIWY emtFTkufshw= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF83BA889B; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 17:02:56 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.76.80.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E339DA8898; Fri, 13 Dec 2019 17:02:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Derrick Stolee Cc: Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, szeder.dev@gmail.com, newren@gmail.com, Derrick Stolee Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] sparse-checkout: respect core.ignoreCase in cone mode References: <23705845ce73992bf7ab645d28febebe0a698d49.1575920580.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> <7aeb1589-cc08-654f-1bc0-d48fec1c0729@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 14:02:51 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Derrick Stolee's message of "Fri, 13 Dec 2019 14:40:58 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 4FFD8228-1DF4-11EA-ABC6-B0405B776F7B-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Derrick Stolee writes: > On 12/13/2019 2:05 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Derrick Stolee writes: >> >>> If you have a plan for that branch and the merge status of those >>> commits, then I'm happy to re-target my PR against 'next' or >>> an equivalent branch. >> >> This change does not make much sense without the cone-mode topic, >> no? > > I'm saying it should go on top, as a new branch that depends on > ds/sparse-cone. Sorry for not making that clear. I thought that it was a *bug* that ds/sparse-cone topic does not match the pattern case insensitively on case insensitive systems, and from that point of view, letting the earlier part of the topic graduate without the fix would not make sense, I thought. Thanks.