From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C033D1F66E for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 16:44:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728119AbgHUQoN (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Aug 2020 12:44:13 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:53431 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728506AbgHUQmr (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Aug 2020 12:42:47 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26DFE7A3E4; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 12:42:47 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=8J/iAn90zfcFDe8P6Who6XuXJQs=; b=f8OB4/ uM9bfqFzDtcG5XqBWMv0nWHoZGgyCnzTVXkO65ncXKEUbJeWlhUSaNlbqLRndako JRh5cYwJnOnze8RtJQmZ2SMjqoj2m/7DWfBkFtc3IH3M2NoF3U1srO8k9582FX48 stvuxhxI0a/ZBk0tEvMyhTKj8NenvhtWRWt4M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=apSTqNYxNMcsCN3QOHupDkaqMvmZqyKf zClkiLnlEDxQ137K6SbFklQJSG3VLqqr+9IVE1JhYcdtmJbtWVOb1/XylBhQN2V9 z5WWQqzldi7ZRKgA6LE9hXVR7mzUPZE8rrzhLv/iMzRdK4ldNn4P+EHlgU0eckxR I4532+canM0= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E5517A3E3; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 12:42:47 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.75.7.245]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 704617A3E1; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 12:42:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: Patrick Steinhardt , git@vger.kernel.org, Taylor Blau Subject: Re: [PATCH] refs: remove lookup cache for reference-transaction hook References: <0db8ad8cdb69afb9d6453bf60a808e8b82382a4e.1597998473.git.ps@pks.im> <20200821143727.GA3241139@coredump.intra.peff.net> Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 09:42:45 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20200821143727.GA3241139@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Fri, 21 Aug 2020 10:37:27 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 578B4CCE-E3CD-11EA-BDA4-01D9BED8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: > However, I wondered... > >> +test_perf "nonatomic push" ' >> + git push ./target-repo.git branch-{1..1000} && >> + git push --delete ./target-repo.git branch-{1..1000} >> +' Is this a bash-and-ksh-only test? At least, the above would not try to push 1000 branches with the version of dash I have.