From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6AA41F670 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 07:38:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238870AbiCDHjn (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2022 02:39:43 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51484 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232100AbiCDHjn (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2022 02:39:43 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (pb-smtp2.pobox.com [64.147.108.71]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF681107A89 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2022 23:38:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0C7710B6A8; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 02:38:54 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=xBMSRRBV4zspPEKPwwPyKiqejPNDyLWzVg0UIh vfXvI=; b=BeLEskG1AZpj94bQRiK1DAj+zgY/tNK0PLVxZ3Qf7LJc6jlTvvkDuL nBjhefwB/iD9WfxAdxKIx+ru6QZiU7Y/9pOP3e+eEgeHAKWgY5pzpuUOyVj0a2n5 bz+9NMnzlKDvhZzCsOZdqO9+/5fnAAqAKLigAyztWqdCbt4RIdcDQ= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9729910B6A7; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 02:38:54 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [35.230.65.123]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9C2AB10B6A6; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 02:38:52 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Schindelin Cc: Jacob Keller Subject: win+VS environment has "cut" but not "paste"? References: <220220.86bkz1d7hm.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com> <220222.86tucr6kz5.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com> <505afc19-25bd-7ccb-7fb2-26bcc9d47119@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2022 23:38:51 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Fri, 25 Feb 2022 10:16:00 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 2399EB62-9B8E-11EC-9245-CB998F0A682E-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org GitHub CI seems to fail due to lack of "paste" for win+VS job. This was somewhat unexpected, as our test scripts seem to make liberal use of "cut" that goes together with it. https://github.com/git/git/runs/5415486631?check_suite_focus=true#step:5:6199 The particular failure at the URL comes from the use of "paste" in 5ea4f3a5 (name-rev: use generation numbers if available, 2022-02-28), but it hardly is the first use of the command. There is one use of it in t/aggregate-results.sh in 'master/main' already. We could rewrite the tests that use "paste" but looking at the use of the tool in the test (and the aggregate thing), rewriting them due to lack of a tool, whose source should be freely available from where "cut" was taken from, does not sound like too attractive a direction to go in, but I do not know how much work is involved in adding it (and in general, any basic tool with similar complexity that we may find missing in the future) to the win+VS environment. Thoughts? Thanks.